- Oct 9, 1999
- 72,636
- 46
- 91
First of all, the majority [regardless of which graphic solution they produce] have told us that they believe that ATI is not cheating. They believe that if NVIDIA requires certain questionable optimizations in their drivers and ATI does not all while still leading benchmarks, the consumer is going to catch on very fast about who they should choose for their next graphics solution purchase. The majority additionally are sure that this will play out very soon. We have been informed by manufacturers that NVIDIA was back in Taiwan about 3 weeks prior to Computex, to supposedly answer for their actions and reassure consumers. This was strategic move an anticipation of AquaMark and Half-Life 2 benchmarks that were going to pop up soon. The basic content of the discussion between NVIDIA and their respective manufacturers were to reassure them that they were doing fine and to expect everything fixed with newer and better drivers. However, those traditionally considered NVIDIA strongholds told us that they are seriously discussing the possibilities of ATI internally.
Originally posted by: Ionizer86
Ok, so like on my e740, which has both SD and CF, I tested a 128MB Memorex CF and a 128MB Memorex SD (they don't have speed ratings written on them). File size was 10.3MB (biggest file on my PDA) Transfers were done from main memory to memory cards. Data:
SD 18.34s
CF 19.56s
SD felt a bit snappier with the percents moving up.
That is VERY interesting. This answers all the nVidia/DX9 questions. Very interesting view point indeed. I knew nVidia should have been using SecureDigital memory!Originally posted by: Ionizer86
Ok, so like on my e740, which has both SD and CF, I tested a 128MB Memorex CF and a 128MB Memorex SD (they don't have speed ratings written on them). File size was 10.3MB (biggest file on my PDA) Transfers were done from main memory to memory cards. Data:
SD 18.34s
CF 19.56s
SD felt a bit snappier with the percents moving up.
OMG, that is ridiculous
LOL, i don't think the nv38 will change anything on the dx9 problems at all... it's still a nv35 on steroids.
the one shown in the italian forum is a nv36. the pic linked above is the nv38 (i hate to say it but *cough* tom's*cough* has comfirmation on that.Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
According to theInq, here are real pictures of NV36 & NV38.
Originally posted by: Luagsch
the one shown in the italian forum is a nv36. the pic linked above is the nv38 (i hate to say it but *cough* tom's*cough* has comfirmation on that.Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
According to theInq, here are real pictures of NV36 & NV38.
i suck at teh interweb...Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
There is more than one page to that article...Originally posted by: Luagsch
the one shown in the italian forum is a nv36. the pic linked above is the nv38 (i hate to say it but *cough* tom's*cough* has comfirmation on that.Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
According to theInq, here are real pictures of NV36 & NV38.
hehe, he's probably playing half-life 2 right now on a p4ee/amd64 + r360Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I think it's very safe to say that Anand has already run R360 vs. NV38 and RV360 vs. NV36 benches.
Wonder if it was DET 50.XX vs. CAT 3.8?
Originally posted by: Luagsch
hehe, he's probably playing half-life 2 right now on a p4ee/amd64 + r360Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I think it's very safe to say that Anand has already run R360 vs. NV38 and RV360 vs. NV36 benches.
Wonder if it was DET 50.XX vs. CAT 3.8?
Originally posted by: Luagsch
hehe, he's probably playing half-life 2 right now on a p4ee/amd64 + r360Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I think it's very safe to say that Anand has already run R360 vs. NV38 and RV360 vs. NV36 benches.
Wonder if it was DET 50.XX vs. CAT 3.8?