- Dec 30, 2004
- 12,553
- 2
- 76
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3750
Enjoy! I am reading now. Will post thoughts later.
Other reviews from other sites here:
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/ati_radeon_hd_5830_performance/
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/radeon-hd5830.html
http://hothardware.com/articles/ATI-Radeon-HD-5830-Filling-The-Gap/
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-5830,2564.html
Can anyone explain why this is slower than the 4890 EVEN WHEN OVERCLOCKED PAST 4890 CORE SPEEDS????
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/radeon-hd5830_6.html#sect2
it has fricking 1120 shaders. The 4890 has 800. Does not compute.
Enjoy! I am reading now. Will post thoughts later.
Other reviews from other sites here:
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/ati_radeon_hd_5830_performance/
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/radeon-hd5830.html
http://hothardware.com/articles/ATI-Radeon-HD-5830-Filling-The-Gap/
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-5830,2564.html
Can anyone explain why this is slower than the 4890 EVEN WHEN OVERCLOCKED PAST 4890 CORE SPEEDS????
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/radeon-hd5830_6.html#sect2
it has fricking 1120 shaders. The 4890 has 800. Does not compute.
Last edited: