TastesLikeChicken
Lifer
- Sep 12, 2004
- 16,852
- 59
- 86
I was right that Iraq would come around, despite the mis-steps and problems along the way. It has.Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I love it when the rump patters come in here to try to salvage one of their buddy's lame arguments by exclaiming a victory that never was. Hee-larious.Originally posted by: Ldir
Nice smack down! How many beatings can this tool take before he gets it? What was the comedy where the knight got his arms and legs cut off but still thought he was winning? Tasteslikechicken is just as ridiculous. He is wrong about everything but his ego is too big to quit. He lays in the corner spitting at the world as it passes him by.
Face it. You can't tolerate the fact that I was right about Iraq. Clearly it absolutely galls you right to the bone. The anti-war crew will deny and refute it until it's clear that they just can't deny it any longer, just like they did with Patraeus. We've seen it all before. All the foot stomping and huffing was/is gold though; pure gold. Shows what you guys are really made of...nothing but hard, empty heads.
So, what were you right about again? The troop surge? Weren't the bazillions of individuals who suggested that troop levels needed increasing for five long years right before you were right?
Hardly seems a reason to gloat, but if it makes you feel good about yourself, by all means go ahead.
And drop the slight-of-hand argument about the extra troops. The extra troops that you guys were arguing for well exceeded the 28,000 of the surge, not to mention that the anti-war crowd began deeming the surge a failure before it even went into motion and continued to deem it a failure long after its success was recognized by most. So don't be revisionist about that point please. It doesn't withstand the least bit of scrutiny.
