• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

An oral presentation explaining why conservatives don't understand the 1st Amendment

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
67,141
3,837
126
Lots of fun but I heard no explanation as to why conservatives don’t understand the first amendment unless the reason is just the obvious that they are batshit crazy. Obviously and fortunately, however, they do seem to fear more than batshit crazy is to be sued.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
26,689
12,007
136
I thought Kamala did all the oral presentations in this Administration.
Well look who's back. I'm sure you've spent time compiling the excuses you will dump on us for those racist traitorous Republicans.

I'm sure we'll be seeing them
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
7,474
2,148
136
Only listened to the first half of the first clip. Howard clearly doesn't know the specifics, which is a shame because the picture he paints is actually more limited than things really are.
 

AmyJUW

Junior Member
Apr 30, 2021
1
2
36
If you do not understand, then it is better to refrain from comments. I am annoyed by such experts who go everywhere with their stupid comments. As for the oral presentation, it is not very effective. Everyone understands and hears how it will turn out and what they want. The most effective are the usual classic presentations on the screen using slides. This is the easiest and most effective way to present the information correctly and without distortion. This is especially important in a business environment. Here https://slidepeak.com/blog/how-to-make-a-stunning-business-presentation, you can find great tips on how to make an amazing business presentation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Muse and iRONic

tweaker2

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
12,097
3,381
136
The problem that I see with Repubs and their version of free speech is that they take for granted that telling lies is a form of free speech. They, and the party they belong to have for decades relied on a preponderance of lies to justify their existence and their ideology.

They have to lie and to lie with conviction about how they on the one hand demand small gov't and fiscal conservancy while on the other demand that their medicare, ACA benefits, social security and welfare checks remain untouched by the very socialist (democratic) run gov't they were taught to despise.

Having to live in a nation where socialism is practiced for their own benefit while being taught by their GOP leadership that socialism is a form of communism and should never be tolerated will inevitably lead to their having to rely on lies to somehow make sense of their contradictory views as a political entity.

So they added in to that conundrum a stab at unifying themselves by injecting another pair of contradictory beliefs into the mix: racism and religious fundamentalism. They, through lying to themselves have somehow been able to think that it's A-OK to be both and have no problem with that.

Small wonder how that party of theirs chose the pathological liar Trump as their idol and leader.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
30,162
3,562
126
The problem that I see with Repubs and their version of free speech is that they take for granted that telling lies is a form of free speech. They, and the party they belong to have for decades relied on a preponderance of lies to justify their existence and their ideology.

They have to lie and to lie with conviction about how they on the one hand demand small gov't and fiscal conservancy while on the other demand that their medicare, ACA benefits, social security and welfare checks remain untouched by the very socialist (democratic) run gov't they were taught to despise.

Having to live in a nation where socialism is practiced for their own benefit while being taught by their GOP leadership that socialism is a form of communism and should never be tolerated will inevitably lead to their having to rely on lies to somehow make sense of their contradictory views as a political entity.

So they added in to that conundrum a stab at unifying themselves by injecting another pair of contradictory beliefs into the mix: racism and religious fundamentalism. They, through lying to themselves have somehow been able to think that it's A-OK to be both and have no problem with that.

Small wonder how that party of theirs chose the pathological liar Trump as their idol and leader.
It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. - Upton Sinclair
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
16,001
5,913
136
Lots of fun but I heard no explanation as to why conservatives don’t understand the first amendment unless the reason is just the obvious that they are batshit crazy. Obviously and fortunately, however, they do seem to fear more than batshit crazy is to be sued.
I dont think that is it.
These morons do these moronic things, rant about these moronic things, cause that is the message they get from up stairs. Leadership matters. Now why is the leadership acting this way, channeling this message? Power. They have no idea how to stay in power, outside of this bat-shit pocket they are in. Its that simple. There is nothing more scary to a power-person than losing that which is most precious to him. They are not in it for the people, you or anyone else, they are in it for themselves, and will do and say *WHATEVER* to stay there. The Trumpians in congress are shit people. Period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muse and Pohemi420

Pohemi420

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
3,927
1,411
136
I thought Kamala did all the oral presentations in this Administration.
No more immigrant children in tunnels to grenade?
Damn, I guess we'll have to put up with ignore a higher level of stupidity if you're back on the boards.
Good old classic sexism, how original. Par for the course for the shittiest, most useless people on earth.
Sad and pathetic when these are the best attacks they can make on this admin, isn't it? :rolleyes:
 
Feb 4, 2009
29,845
10,395
136
I would say shooting anyone who "threatens" you would be the logical conclusion of the 2A. Police are just fulfilling its potential.
So it is okay to shoot the cop before he shoots you assuming you have a right to bare arms?
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
30,162
3,562
126
So it is okay to shoot the cop before he shoots you assuming you have a right to bare arms?
Obviously shooting a cop to protect yourself is justifiable if the cop didn't have sufficient provocation to shoot you. Might be a tough time in court. I don't personally know of this having happened, but maybe it has.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
13,090
8,108
136
Obviously shooting a cop to protect yourself is justifiable if the cop didn't have sufficient provocation to shoot you. Might be a tough time in court. I don't personally know of this having happened, but maybe it has.
Breonna Taylor's boyfriend, who opened fire at police on the other side of his front door, was not charged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muse

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
5,788
699
126
The problem that I see with Repubs and their version of free speech is that they take for granted that telling lies is a form of free speech. They, and the party they belong to have for decades relied on a preponderance of lies to justify their existence and their ideology.

They have to lie and to lie with conviction about how they on the one hand demand small gov't and fiscal conservancy while on the other demand that their medicare, ACA benefits, social security and welfare checks remain untouched by the very socialist (democratic) run gov't they were taught to despise.

Having to live in a nation where socialism is practiced for their own benefit while being taught by their GOP leadership that socialism is a form of communism and should never be tolerated will inevitably lead to their having to rely on lies to somehow make sense of their contradictory views as a political entity.

So they added in to that conundrum a stab at unifying themselves by injecting another pair of contradictory beliefs into the mix: racism and religious fundamentalism. They, through lying to themselves have somehow been able to think that it's A-OK to be both and have no problem with that.

Small wonder how that party of theirs chose the pathological liar Trump as their idol and leader.
Democrats have no monopoly on facts or logic.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY