• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

An Intrusive new search

BBond

Diamond Member
Is that a bomb, or are you just happy to see me??? 😀

An Intrusive new search

Thanksgiving travelers may be in for a bit of a shock as they plod through security lines at the nation's airports. Passengers chosen for secondary screening or whose clothing appears suspicious or bulky are now subject to frisking--in a pretty intrusive way. In late September, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) began allowing security checkpoint screeners to manually pat down women's breasts and the genital and derriere regions of both sexes during searches. The point is to find hidden explosives while machines that might perform the job are still being tested. "I know it's not pleasant," says Rep. John Mica, chairman of the House aviation subcommittee, "but until we get the technology, what are the options?"

The new policy reflects an increasing sense of urgency about the lack of explosives-detection equipment. Today, only a small percentage of carry-on luggage and passengers is tested for bombs. In its final report, the 9/11 commission said the TSA must give "priority attention" to checking passengers for explosives. In August, two Russian airliners crashed, almost certainly because of explosives two Chechen women had concealed beneath their clothing--underscoring the danger.

Complaints. The TSA policy says that passengers can request that the new screening be done in a private room and requires that the frisker be the same gender as the traveler. But graduate student Sommer Gentry, 27, says that male screeners at Boston's Logan International Airport tried to pat her down while a female screener at Baltimore-Washington International Airport roughly jabbed a metal-detector wand between her legs. "How can I feel safe," Gentry said, " when the TSA is ordering me to let strangers put their hands all over my most intimate places?" TSA spokesman Mark Hatfield says the new policy generates only about a dozen complaints a week, but there have been reports of passengers, mostly women, growing angry during searches.

The TSA is currently testing machines that could eliminate the need for such frisking, like "trace portals" that blow puffs of air at passengers to dislodge and sniff for bits of explosive material. But it will be a while before the machines are ready for widespread use. In the meantime, the TSA will continue the pat-downs and train screeners to explain the process more carefully. "These are very valid security measures," says Hatfield. "They get at a very specific potential threat." But that's not enough for Gentry. "I am now," she says, "an ex-frequent flier." - Samantha Levine



 
Originally posted by: her209
Did you know "right to privacy" is not written in the Constitution? 😉

Good. So go get molested by some $8 per hour rent-a-cop while flying to Granny's house for Thanksgiving.

I'll stay home and let the airlines go out of business.

Oh, that's right. They can't go out of business. The government keeps feeding them corporate welfare in the form of bailouts with our tax dollars.

I guess free enterprise -- like the right to privacy -- is another one of those American myths.

 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: her209
Did you know "right to privacy" is not written in the Constitution? 😉

Good. So go get molested by some $8 per hour rent-a-cop while flying to Granny's house for Thanksgiving.

I'll stay home and let the airlines go out of business.

Oh, that's right. They can't go out of business. The government keeps feeding them corporate welfare in the form of bailouts with our tax dollars.

I guess free enterprise -- like the right to privacy -- is another one of those American myths.



glad we made all the screeners federal employees yet?
 
I wish I had boobs, but I wouldn't want anybody else feeling em up. Of course I would just sit on the couch all day feeeling em up myself.......
 
Originally posted by: Alistar7
I wish I had boobs, but I wouldn't want anybody else feeling em up. Of course I would just sit on the couch all day feeeling em up myself.......



too much information...
 
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: her209
Did you know "right to privacy" is not written in the Constitution? 😉

Good. So go get molested by some $8 per hour rent-a-cop while flying to Granny's house for Thanksgiving.

I'll stay home and let the airlines go out of business.

Oh, that's right. They can't go out of business. The government keeps feeding them corporate welfare in the form of bailouts with our tax dollars.

I guess free enterprise -- like the right to privacy -- is another one of those American myths.



glad we made all the screeners federal employees yet?

Does it make a difference being molested by a private employee???

I choose not to fly at all. Let the airlines all go broke. Stop bailing them out with tax dollars.



 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: her209
Did you know "right to privacy" is not written in the Constitution? 😉

Good. So go get molested by some $8 per hour rent-a-cop while flying to Granny's house for Thanksgiving.

I'll stay home and let the airlines go out of business.

Oh, that's right. They can't go out of business. The government keeps feeding them corporate welfare in the form of bailouts with our tax dollars.

I guess free enterprise -- like the right to privacy -- is another one of those American myths.



glad we made all the screeners federal employees yet?

Does it make a difference being molested by a private employee???

I choose not to fly at all. Let the airlines all go broke. Stop bailing them out with tax dollars.


If it would have happened before they became federal employees, only one airline would have been affected....
 
Since I retired, it is road or rail for me! Just took Amtrack to DC last week and it was so excellent. It isn't just the security, it is the discomfort and the crappy food.
 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: her209
Did you know "right to privacy" is not written in the Constitution? 😉

Good. So go get molested by some $8 per hour rent-a-cop while flying to Granny's house for Thanksgiving.

I'll stay home and let the airlines go out of business.

Oh, that's right. They can't go out of business. The government keeps feeding them corporate welfare in the form of bailouts with our tax dollars.

I guess free enterprise -- like the right to privacy -- is another one of those American myths.

This is a first! I've never, ever agreed with anything you have stated before. Amazing!!!

 
airplanes suck.

Road/rail/boat pwns all your plane.

BTW I am at a school where the #1 major is aviation. All my friends are wannabe pilots. I can't wait to laugh at them when high fuel prices all but annihalate the industry.
 
Originally posted by: her209
Did you know "right to privacy" is not written in the Constitution? 😉

yeh.. its just assumed... personally i think we should have no privacy... cuz i mean ... thats freedom...

shut the fuk up ...
 
I'm a non-flyer until this stuff get's sorted out. I'm also a non-US traveller. Your border guards scare me. Go to Belfast airport. They know terrorism. They also made me feel very comfortable when they searched me. I feel safer in Belfast than I do crossing the border into the US. Freaky.
 
Back
Top