exar333
Diamond Member
- Feb 7, 2004
- 8,518
- 8
- 91
If you search my posts you'll note I have long argued that AMD "Osborned" their phenom II, thuban, and bulldozer products by evangelizing that "the future is fusion". It bothered me intrinsically for a long time.
But...obviously there is a difference between providing a simple roadmap versus handing out the full monte.
The 50% more performance with 33% more cores really didn't tell us jack-crap, hence you see the forums filled full of threads and threads debating the nuance of what that statement even meant. It was tantamount to saying "next year there will be new products, and just like every year preceding it, those new products next year will outperform the products we want you to buy this year".
Every industry has this cycle, be it aerospace, auto, or computers. We all expect next year's products to outperform this year's products.
But AMD is quite intent to avoid having a JC tip their hand. Intel, thanks to their monopoly I am convinced, is the only outlier in this trend of hiding your hand that spans many industries.
Apple does this every year, and people buy their products every year. TV manufacturers also do this with newer and better models every year. You know all the features well ahead of release. Its pretty common these days.
