So a friend of a friend asks me to write an essay (rough draft) for 10 dollars, but I had to write it for a really dumb person:
Although we live in an Earth in which woman are able to act and dominate like man, this was not always. Before, like a century ago, or even less, many womans could not do the same thing that penises appendages possessed man could do. Example is: power, which is still obvious, since woman can?t be the president. However, back on track, women were looked down onto by the men. I can prove this, because even Lord Chesterfield believed women were ?insignificant? and ?only to be used for fashion and entertainment?? Henceforth, even Defoe was able to say ?How much worse is a wise women than a fool?. That, being my thesis, is easily proved, as many history events also support.
For example, like ancient times, read like?maybe 1000 year ago, woman was useless, effectively. Proved by they could not hunt; Only cook and clean. However, man, on my other hand, could hunt and kill all sorts of beasties. Then give it to woman to do useless pathetic jobs like skinning and cooking. Both of which man could have done, but choose not to because he could order woman around. It is obvious that ancient times show the superiority and betterness of man in society.
Also, during the Enlightenment, woman were unable to have liberties, which is what America stands for, and freedom and money. Neoliberal capitalist and exploitations of colored minorities was also important. Foucault also dominated women, proving how they were normalized and biopolitical. I found the above two statements through much research. Back onto the Enlightenment, which was full of surprises, women were most definitely unhappy. Anything left of rorty is the horribleness, like the old and modern women, proven by many facts. "Women, in particular, are rendered weak and wretched by a variety of concurring causes" says Wollstonecraft.
Also, is the fact that Daniel Defoe went against the common belief of the time and stated that women should be educated and that women's rights should not be restricted. However, looking at his background, he has no education and only served to be an ironsmith. Thus, once again, the educated man is greater than the uneducated stupid woman. Stanhope, on the otherside of the smartness spectrum, said ?Women, then, are only children of a larger growth; they have an entertaining tattle and sometimes wit.? This statement is much more supported, as it is only a man, educated like myself, that could write and prove the superiority of man.
enjoy?
better on anyone's eyes?
Although we live in an Earth in which woman are able to act and dominate like man, this was not always. Before, like a century ago, or even less, many womans could not do the same thing that penises appendages possessed man could do. Example is: power, which is still obvious, since woman can?t be the president. However, back on track, women were looked down onto by the men. I can prove this, because even Lord Chesterfield believed women were ?insignificant? and ?only to be used for fashion and entertainment?? Henceforth, even Defoe was able to say ?How much worse is a wise women than a fool?. That, being my thesis, is easily proved, as many history events also support.
For example, like ancient times, read like?maybe 1000 year ago, woman was useless, effectively. Proved by they could not hunt; Only cook and clean. However, man, on my other hand, could hunt and kill all sorts of beasties. Then give it to woman to do useless pathetic jobs like skinning and cooking. Both of which man could have done, but choose not to because he could order woman around. It is obvious that ancient times show the superiority and betterness of man in society.
Also, during the Enlightenment, woman were unable to have liberties, which is what America stands for, and freedom and money. Neoliberal capitalist and exploitations of colored minorities was also important. Foucault also dominated women, proving how they were normalized and biopolitical. I found the above two statements through much research. Back onto the Enlightenment, which was full of surprises, women were most definitely unhappy. Anything left of rorty is the horribleness, like the old and modern women, proven by many facts. "Women, in particular, are rendered weak and wretched by a variety of concurring causes" says Wollstonecraft.
Also, is the fact that Daniel Defoe went against the common belief of the time and stated that women should be educated and that women's rights should not be restricted. However, looking at his background, he has no education and only served to be an ironsmith. Thus, once again, the educated man is greater than the uneducated stupid woman. Stanhope, on the otherside of the smartness spectrum, said ?Women, then, are only children of a larger growth; they have an entertaining tattle and sometimes wit.? This statement is much more supported, as it is only a man, educated like myself, that could write and prove the superiority of man.
enjoy?
better on anyone's eyes?
Facebook
Twitter