Well, for those five people on the forums who don't overclock, or the 5000 people on the forums who want to build a system for someone and don't want to be tech support for an overclocked rig...
I say the OEM 3400+ is a good buy for those Joe Sixpacks (with apologies to overclockers.com) looking for a fast system for these reasons:
- True clock speed of 2.4GHz makes for a fast A64.
- $175 for the OEM chip at various vendors.
- Not a good idea to overclock a Joe Sixpack machine, so .09 cores are not as important.
- Most Joe Sixpacks do NOT upgrade their systems for many years... by then even socket 939 will be obsolete so lack of upgrade path is not a reason to avoid this chip.
- The 3% performance loss (number pulled from any available orifice) from not being dual channel more than made up for by price difference between this chip and any socket 939 chip that runs 2.4GHz true speed.
- Various motherboards are available for any need, mATX, integrated video, AGP, PCI-E.
- Motherboards seem cheaper than socket 939 variants.
What's the performance difference between a s754 3400+ (true 2.4GHz, single channel) and a s939 3500+ (true 2.2GHz, dual channel)? Anyone have numbers? Not talking overclocked speeds, but complete default speeds with same hardware.
What I'm trying to say is that (overclocking aside) $175 for a 2.4GHz A64 is a better value than $265 for a 2.2GHz A64.