Amputee sprinter ruled ineligible for Olympics

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Do you think people with any kind of prosthetics should be allowed to participate in the Olympics?

Amputee sprinter ruled ineligible for Olympics

Associated Press
Updated: January 14, 2008, 11:27 AM

MONTE CARLO, Monaco (AP) - The IAAF ruled Monday that double-amputee sprinter Oscar Pistorius is ineligible to compete in the Beijing Olympics because his prosthetic racing legs give him a clear competitive advantage.

The International Association of Athletics Federations had twice postponed the ruling, but the executive Council said the South African runner's curved, prosthetic "Cheetah" blades were considered a technical aid in violation of the rules.

"As a result, Oscar Pistorius is ineligible to compete in competitions organized under IAAF rules," the IAAF said in a statement from Monte Carlo, Monaco.

Pistorius, known as the "blade runner," announced last week that he planned to appeal any adverse decision, including taking the case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, Switzerland.

Athletics South Africa said it would immediately apply the decision, further complicating Pistorius' future since he will not be able to set legal Olympic qualifying times in his own country.

"That's a huge blow," said Pistorius' manager, Peet Van Zyl. "He has been competing in South African abled-bodied competition for the past three years. At this stage it looks like he is out of any able-bodied event."

The decision was reached in an e-mail vote by the 27-member IAAF Council. The vote count was not disclosed but was believed to be unanimous.

The IAAF endorsed studies by German professor Gert-Peter Brueggemann, who conducted tests on the prosthetic limbs and said they give Pistorius a clear competitive advantage over able-bodied runners.

"An athlete using this prosthetic blade has a demonstrable mechanical advantage (more than 30 percent) when compared to someone not using the blade," the IAAF said.

The federation said Pistorius had been allowed to compete in some able-bodied events until now because his case was so unique that such artificial protheses had not been properly studied.

"We did not have the science," IAAF spokesman Nick Davies said. "Now we have the science. We are only interested in competitions that we govern."

Davies stressed the findings only covered Pistorius' specific blades and did not necessarily mean that all lesser-abled athletes would automatically be excluded.

The ruling does not affect Pistorius' eligibility for Paralympic events, in which he was a gold medalist in Athens in 2004.

"It's unfortunate because he could have boosted team athletics at the Olympics at Beijing, because he had the potential to qualify," said Leonard Chuene, president of Athletics South Africa.

Chuene said the federation would respect the ruling.

"There's not much we can do," he said. "It rules him out with immediate effect. We use the IAAF rule book. If we had our rules and our own competition, it would be easier. It is a huge problem."

Pistorius finished second in the 400 meters at the South African National Championships last year against able-bodied runners.

The runner worked with Brueggemann in Cologne for two days of testing in November to learn to what extent the j-shaped carbon-fiber extensions to his amputated legs differed from the legs of fully abled runners.

Brueggemann found that Pistorius was able to run at the same speed as able bodied runners on about a quarter less energy. He found that once the runners hit a certain stride, athletes with artificial limbs needed less additional energy than other athletes.

The professor found that the returned energy "from the prosthetic blade is close to three times higher than with the human ankle joint in maximum sprinting."

Based on these findings, the Council ruled against Pistorius.

The findings are contested by the Pistorius camp.

"Based on the feedback that we got, the general feeling was that there were a lot of variables that weren't taken into consideration and that all avenues hadn't been explored in terms of coming to a final conclusion on whether Oscar was getting some advantage or not," Van Zyl said. "We were hoping that they would reconsider and hopefully do some more tests."

The IAAF adopted a rule last summer prohibiting the use of any "technical aids" deemed to give an athlete an advantage over another.

Ossur, the Icelandic company which is a leader in the production of prosthetics, braces and supports and also made Pistorius' blades, has said the blades do not provide an edge over able-bodied athletes.

Pistorius has set world records in the 100, 200 and 400 in Paralympic events.

Pistorius was born without fibulas - the long, thin outer bone between the knee and ankle ? and was 11 months old when his legs were amputated below the knee.

He began running competitively four years ago to treat a rugby injury, and nine months later won the 200 meters at the 2004 Paralympic Games in Athens.

Pistorius competed in the 400 at two international-level able-bodied meets in 2007. He finished second in a B race in 46.90 seconds at the Golden League meet in Rome on July 13 and, two days later, was disqualified for running out of his lane in Sheffield, England.
http://msn.foxsports.com/olymp...story/7658380?MSNHPHMA
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Do you?
hey, answering a question with a question :thumbsdown:

no, i don't think they should be allowed. the playing field would be distorted.

there i said it, and you?
 

Ramma2

Platinum Member
Jul 29, 2002
2,710
1
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Do you?
hey, answering a question with a question :thumbsdown:

no, i don't think they should be allowed. the playing field would be distorted.

there i said it, and you?

I concur with this statement.
 

chuckywang

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
20,133
1
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Do you?
hey, answering a question with a question :thumbsdown:

no, i don't think they should be allowed. the playing field would be distorted.

there i said it, and you?

I say let him compete, but don't give him a medal if he wins.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
As much as I admire the guy, I have to agree with the IAAF. If I had that I, Robot cyborg arm Will Smith had, I could bench like 2 tons. Thus I'd have a serious advantage over any other contestants in anything involving arm strength. This is the same thing on a smaller scale.
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
Yeah, the unfair part is that if designed properly the legs can store energy from the previous step and therefore take less energy to go the same speed = unfair.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Do you?
hey, answering a question with a question :thumbsdown:

no, i don't think they should be allowed. the playing field would be distorted.

there i said it, and you?

I say let him compete, but don't give him a medal if he wins.
that's a can of worms though. so many would want to emulate that. there wouldn't be room for them all.
 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
Originally posted by: Ramma2
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Do you?
hey, answering a question with a question :thumbsdown:

no, i don't think they should be allowed. the playing field would be distorted.

there i said it, and you?

I concur with this statement.

x2
 

Slick5150

Diamond Member
Nov 10, 2001
8,760
3
81
Yes, it was the right decision. Not that the IAAF is at all a trustworthy source to ensure the "legitimacy" of any type of sporting event, but in this case, they made the right call.
 

Gothgar

Lifer
Sep 1, 2004
13,429
1
0
If he was allowed to compete and won, it'd be interesting to see athletes in the future, purposely replacing limbs with robotics to win, so it is a good thing he is not going to be allowed in.
 

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,740
35
91
Interesting, his prosthetic reminds me of the device the character from the game Portal wears on her feet (supposedly to protect against falling damage).
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
People with certain prosthetics like this should not be allowed to play. But other prosthetics might be fine.
 

se7en

Platinum Member
Oct 23, 2002
2,303
1
0
cyborgs should not compete with humans its unfair.

Whats next a double amputee with 2 mechanical arms complete witha hydraulic lifting system going to compete in the weight lifting?
 

Mr Pickles

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
4,103
1
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Do you?
hey, answering a question with a question :thumbsdown:

no, i don't think they should be allowed. the playing field would be distorted.

there i said it, and you?

I say let him compete, but don't give him a medal if he wins.
that's a can of worms though. so many would want to emulate that. there wouldn't be room for them all.

Lol what? Put an * next to his name? Alright, curveball here: Should a sprinter be allowed to compete if he has a fake arm? I think it should be subjective. They shouldn't be allowed to compete in an event if they are given an unfair advantage over their competitors.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: MrLee
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Do you?
hey, answering a question with a question :thumbsdown:

no, i don't think they should be allowed. the playing field would be distorted.

there i said it, and you?

I say let him compete, but don't give him a medal if he wins.
that's a can of worms though. so many would want to emulate that. there wouldn't be room for them all.

Lol what? Put an * next to his name? Alright, curveball here: Should a sprinter be allowed to compete if he has a fake arm? I think it should be subjective. They shouldn't be allowed to compete in an event if they are given an unfair advantage over their competitors.
Oh, put an * next to his name like... Barry Bonds should have?
 

Mr Pickles

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
4,103
1
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: MrLee
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Do you?
hey, answering a question with a question :thumbsdown:

no, i don't think they should be allowed. the playing field would be distorted.

there i said it, and you?

I say let him compete, but don't give him a medal if he wins.
that's a can of worms though. so many would want to emulate that. there wouldn't be room for them all.

Lol what? Put an * next to his name? Alright, curveball here: Should a sprinter be allowed to compete if he has a fake arm? I think it should be subjective. They shouldn't be allowed to compete in an event if they are given an unfair advantage over their competitors.
Oh, put an * next to his name like... Barry Bonds should have?

Yeah that was what I was referring to.

 

DangerAardvark

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2004
7,559
0
0
I think it would be awesome if runners started amputating their legs to get crazy bionic prosthetics to even compete.