- Jul 4, 2003
- 39
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: dahunan
OK.. so what do the rules say?
After he is injured **and already set booby traps** are we supposed to rush to him and take care of his medical needs? His injury did not limit his ability to set off the booby traps and kill people...
This man *the Iraqi* was a sniper in a war and got what he deserved.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: dahunan
OK.. so what do the rules say?
After he is injured **and already set booby traps** are we supposed to rush to him and take care of his medical needs? His injury did not limit his ability to set off the booby traps and kill people...
This man *the Iraqi* was a sniper in a war and got what he deserved.
I don't think it was the actual killing...umm that is kind of expected in a war..but the cheering.
Personally, I don't find either objectionable/shocking/whatever. I would have killed the guy too.
I just find it funny that people are constantly condemming Iraqis for that sort of behavior, but it is A-OK when it is our guys.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: dahunan
OK.. so what do the rules say?
After he is injured **and already set booby traps** are we supposed to rush to him and take care of his medical needs? His injury did not limit his ability to set off the booby traps and kill people...
This man *the Iraqi* was a sniper in a war and got what he deserved.
I don't think it was the actual killing...umm that is kind of expected in a war..but the cheering.
Personally, I don't find either objectionable/shocking/whatever. I would have killed the guy too.
I just find it funny that people are constantly condemming Iraqis for that sort of behavior, but it is A-OK when it is our guys.
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: dahunan
OK.. so what do the rules say?
After he is injured **and already set booby traps** are we supposed to rush to him and take care of his medical needs? His injury did not limit his ability to set off the booby traps and kill people...
This man *the Iraqi* was a sniper in a war and got what he deserved.
I don't think it was the actual killing...umm that is kind of expected in a war..but the cheering.
Personally, I don't find either objectionable/shocking/whatever. I would have killed the guy too.
I just find it funny that people are constantly condemming Iraqis for that sort of behavior, but it is A-OK when it is our guys.
Count me in as a CHEER supporter.
I would have been happy as can be that I killed that man too. He was going to kill me or a protector of mine.. If our soldiers took time to grieve for every enemy they killed then they would be useless.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: dahunan
OK.. so what do the rules say?
After he is injured **and already set booby traps** are we supposed to rush to him and take care of his medical needs? His injury did not limit his ability to set off the booby traps and kill people...
This man *the Iraqi* was a sniper in a war and got what he deserved.
I don't think it was the actual killing...umm that is kind of expected in a war..but the cheering.
Personally, I don't find either objectionable/shocking/whatever. I would have killed the guy too.
I just find it funny that people are constantly condemming Iraqis for that sort of behavior, but it is A-OK when it is our guys.
Count me in as a CHEER supporter.
I would have been happy as can be that I killed that man too. He was going to kill me or a protector of mine.. If our soldiers took time to grieve for every enemy they killed then they would be useless.
So by that note, you find nothing wrong with Iraqis cheering over the deaths of Americans. Just to be consistant you see.
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
"Hell yeah, that was awesome, let's do it again!" Wow, what a rush it must be . . . killing a wounded guy writhing around on the ground. Let's cheer and trivialize people's lives.![]()
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
"Hell yeah, that was awesome, let's do it again!" Wow, what a rush it must be . . . killing a wounded guy writhing around on the ground. Let's cheer and trivialize people's lives.![]()
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
So why not just shoot him and be done with it? Instead you get a bunch of retards standing around cheering like they just got off a rollercoaster. Also, while I guess the Geneva Convention doesn't apply to "enemy combatants" or whatever, don't you think they could learn more by taking this wounded guy prisoner? Can't you learn valuable information from an enemy like this?
Originally posted by: BDawg
I suppose the way to see if this is right or wrong is the following.
What would you think if it were an Iraqi who shot an American, with other Iraqis celebrating?
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
So why not just shoot him and be done with it? Instead you get a bunch of retards standing around cheering like they just got off a rollercoaster. Also, while I guess the Geneva Convention doesn't apply to "enemy combatants" or whatever, don't you think they could learn more by taking this wounded guy prisoner? Can't you learn valuable information from an enemy like this?
Originally posted by: miguel
It looks like propoganda to me. I didn't see the whole thing, it was cut and spliced together. I would have like to seen the entire segment. Why the editing? Even the guy talking to the reporter was cut and spliced.![]()