American Family Radio "family values" advocate gets 15 years for child porn

Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
From this site.

I hate to kick a guy when he's down, but since Kenny Stevens and the American Family Associtaion spend much of their time arguing that Howard Stern is leading to the downfall of Western civilization (here, for example), I can't help but find this a little funny.

The Clarion-Ledger (MS)
June 3, 2004

Ex-radio exec to do time for child porn

Tupelo man given 15 years on two counts of producing pornography
By Jerry Mitchell

A former official at American Family Radio, which regularly warns
listeners about the dangers of pornography, must serve 15 years in
prison for producing child pornography.

In federal court in Aberdeen Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Glen H.
Davidson sentenced Kerry Dwayne Stevens, 47, of Tupelo, who
pleaded guilty to two counts of producing child pornography. A law
passed by Congress last year requires a mandatory 15-year sentence
for creating child pornography.

"It's tragic for everybody involved," said the Rev. Donald Wildmon,
founder and executive director of the Tupelo-based American Family
Association, which started the fast-growing Christian radio network.
"It's one of those things you wish had never happened. His family
was devastated."

American Family Radio, with more than 200 stations in 35 states,
fired Stevens, who produced a children's show for the network as
director of children's news, but Wildmon said the association has
helped to support the family financially through the tragedy.

U.S. Attorney Jim Greenlee of Oxford praised the cooperation of
Tupelo police and the FBI in the case. "The citizens of Tupelo and
the (Northern District of Mississippi) should be glad to know that
child pornography creators such as Mr. Stevens are being held
accountable," he said.

Stevens must now register as a sex offender and submit DNA
samples. He must also take lie detector tests and undergo psychiatric
treatment.

On Aug. 23, 2003, two California men renting Stevens' home during
the Tupelo Furniture Market spotted images of possible child
pornography on a computer disk while searching for an empty disk.
They turned two disks over to Tupelo police.

Four days later, police arrested Stevens, who remarked "he had a
problem with children pornography," but "had not touched any of the
children."

After his arrest, court documents say Stevens urged 1st District U.S.
Rep. Roger Wicker to influence Davidson to rule favorably on a
motion to suppress evidence. In a motion opposing bond, prosecutors
wrote, "This overt attempt to obstruct justice should surely weigh on
the court in assessing guilt, flight risk and danger to the
community."

In his letter to Wicker, Stevens wrote, "I took my eyes off of Jesus
for a moment and did something terrible ... I took some pictures of
one of my daughter's friends. Suffice it to say that these pictures
were of her in various sleeping positions. Let me hasten to add that
I never touched her person, nor are there any ... showing her face,
nor was there any involvement with the Internet. I did not do this
for personal profit, but from a dark sin. Nor did I touch her,
because I didn't want to wake her and have her damaged
psychologically. And truthfully, I didn't want to take a chance on
getting caught.

"I know what I did was wrong. Oh, how I wish I could simply undo
what I've done!! But I can't."

But Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Roberts in court suggested Stevens
did more than just snap pictures, saying photographs showed an adult
hand adjusting clothing and in one case touching a minor child.

The American Family Association, which boasts it has more than 2
million members, has made fighting pornography one of its top
priorities.

AFA has promoted a boycott of the Movie Gallery video chain for its
rental of porn videos and has urged parents to complain about grocery
checkout lines where "kids (are) corralled like cattle and force-fed
doses of porn" from magazines such as Cosmopolitan.

The association sells Internet filters to families to block
objectionable material and offers workshops and counseling to those
combating pornography and "sex addiction."

Days after the arrest, Wildmon met with Stevens. "He was just a shell
of a person," Wildmon said. "We told him we forgive him."

Wednesday's sentencing serves as a reminder, Wildmon said. "It
shows everybody is vulnerable. If not this, then something else along
the way. All of us are weak in some area."
 

Gravity

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2003
5,685
0
0
Well, it is ironic but it's not uncommon for peeps battling pr0n to become involved in it somehow. It's too bad. Kinda like Clinton taking his pants off in the whitehouse, something you just never wanted to be informed about.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
This guy deserves to be kicked while he's down, no? This

"He was just a shell of a person," Wildmon said. "We told him we forgive him."
Yeah it took him to get caught to be a shell of a person. Before that he was spewing hypocritical self-righteous nonsense.

This reminds me of Rush. If you're gonna throw stones make sure you don't live in a glass house (or something like that).
 

SViscusi

Golden Member
Apr 12, 2000
1,200
8
81
With all the fighting and hate going on today, its stories like this that give me hope for the future. There is nothing better than seeing a self-rightness prick get run over by the karma train.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: Gravity
Well, it is ironic but it's not uncommon for peeps battling pr0n to become involved in it somehow. It's too bad. Kinda like Clinton taking his pants off in the whitehouse, something you just never wanted to be informed about.

I don't think he became involved in child porn by battling regular porn. There's a big difference. How about we apply some right-wing rules and ask this jerk to take responsibility instead of blaming it on videos of naked adults.

This is not like Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton wasn't committing a crime by having sex extramaritally (at least not by most states' law). This guy was committing a crime and hurting children. It's absurd to compare this to Bill Clinton.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Perfectly legal in the netherlands, the left's poster-child of a happy and peaceful society :)
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: alchemize
Perfectly legal in the netherlands, the left's poster-child of a happy and peaceful society :)


What exactly are you claiming is legal in the Netherlands?

This guy was the right's poster-child of a self-righteous crusader. It sounds like you're wishing that he was a left-winger. Perhaps you are in denial?
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: alchemize
Perfectly legal in the netherlands, the left's poster-child of a happy and peaceful society :)

Why must you turn every conversation into a left-vs-right debate? Keep that crap to yourself once in a while.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gravity
Well, it is ironic but it's not uncommon for peeps battling pr0n to become involved in it somehow. It's too bad. Kinda like Clinton taking his pants off in the whitehouse, something you just never wanted to be informed about.

I don't think he became involved in child porn by battling regular porn. There's a big difference. How about we apply some right-wing rules and ask this jerk to take responsibility instead of blaming it on videos of naked adults.

This is not like Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton wasn't committing a crime by having sex extramaritally (at least not by most states' law). This guy was committing a crime and hurting children. It's absurd to compare this to Bill Clinton.

Technically it was against the law, but he wouldn't have been charged anyway even if he wasn't the President. DC Adultery Law

But I digress - this guy's actions were disgusting and repulsive. He should be held accountable and should be punished just as severely as others who have been convicted of such a crime. Who he is, claimed to be, or was a part of makes no difference in my mind. He broke the law - he should be punished for it.

CkG
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Kinda like Clinton taking his pants off in the whitehouse,

You expect him to sleep in his pants? I'll bet Hillary took her pants off in the White House too! We won't mention Chelsey. Might throw me in jail for 15 years.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: alchemize
Perfectly legal in the netherlands, the left's poster-child of a happy and peaceful society :)

And child pornography is not legal in the Netherlands. From Interpol:

Article 240b of the Penal Code

'A term of of imprisonment of not more than four years or a fine of the fifth category shall be imposed on a person who either disseminates, publicly displays, manufactures, imports, transits, exports, or has in stock an image or a data carrier, containing an image, of a sexual act in which a person who clearly has not reached the age of sixteen (16) is involved.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: alchemize
Perfectly legal in the netherlands, the left's poster-child of a happy and peaceful society :)

And child pornography is not legal in the Netherlands. From Interpol:

Article 240b of the Penal Code

'A term of of imprisonment of not more than four years or a fine of the fifth category shall be imposed on a person who either disseminates, publicly displays, manufactures, imports, transits, exports, or has in stock an image or a data carrier, containing an image, of a sexual act in which a person who clearly has not reached the age of sixteen (16) is involved.

A person who has such an image in stock is not criminally liable, where it has been established that he uses it for scientific, educational or therapeutic purposes.

A term of imprisonment of not more than six years or a fine of the fifth category shall be imposed upon a person who, by profession or custom, commits any of the serious offenses defined in section 1.'
Article 253 of the Penal Code

'A person by whom a child under the age of twelve over whom he exercises legal authority, knowing that it will be used in or for the purpose of begging, hazardous artistic performances or work that is hazardous or deleterious to health, is surrended to or left in the control of another is liable to a term of imprisonment of not more than three years or a fine of the fourth category.'

Might as well be. It's like decriminalized pot. You can possess it, but can't distribute it. And of course, 16 and 17 year olds are fair game.

Edit: Germany is 14. Too kind
 

Kappo

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2000
2,381
0
0
In all fairness, I think his punishment is fitting. Now if we could just get people who actually physically abuse children to get as much time.... I had a local story about a 32 year old guy that raped a 9 year old and got 6 years to serve.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: alchemize

Might as well be. It's like decriminalized pot. You can possess it, but can't distribute it. And of course, 16 and 17 year olds are fair game.

Are you an attorney licensed in the Netherlands, or in law enforcement there?

You're right about 16-year-olds and up - the age of sexual consent is 16 in many states in the US as well.

Of course, none of this has to do with my basic objection to your post - that you insist on turning everything into a partisan issue. This level of fixation clouds your perception IMO, because you see everything through a partisan lens. Must be pretty dull living in a black and white world.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Kappo
In all fairness, I think his punishment is fitting. Now if we could just get people who actually physically abuse children to get as much time.... I had a local story about a 32 year old guy that raped a 9 year old and got 6 years to serve.

I agree. Your anecdote is actually not uncommon at all. First-time sex offenders here in WA are often given a diversion program that only requires them to serve 6 months in confinement. I have seen that deal offered to an offender who had committed oral sex on a 2-year-old.

This is a topic I get pretty passionate about (I once sent a guy to prison for life for child molestation), but on balance 15 years strikes me as being on the high side for taking photos of a sleeping girl. I find these kinds of mandatory minimum sentences a little scary, in that they inhibit any kind of judicial discretion.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: alchemize

Might as well be. It's like decriminalized pot. You can possess it, but can't distribute it. And of course, 16 and 17 year olds are fair game.

Are you an attorney licensed in the Netherlands, or in law enforcement there?

You're right about 16-year-olds and up - the age of sexual consent is 16 in many states in the US as well.

Of course, none of this has to do with my basic objection to your post - that you insist on turning everything into a partisan issue. This level of fixation clouds your perception IMO, because you see everything through a partisan lens. Must be pretty dull living in a black and white world.

Umm...OP? That was you that started this little ole thread, isn't it?
American Family Radio "family values" advocate gets 15 years for child porn
Was that a different Don_Vito? Usually most wait to be a hypocrite on a different thread...

So in summary kiddies, if you post a partisan thread about the irony of a right-winger being busted for kiddie porn, then you are seeing the world through the crystal clear lens of a non-partisan. But if you point out the lefts double and triple standards when it comes to said kiddie-porn, why you are a blind partisan!



PS: More on the netherlands:

Although almost all of the 15 European Union member states seek stronger measures to combat pornography involving children, the Netherlands opposed Belgium's proposal to make it a criminal offense to possess such material for "personal ends". So the possession of pornographic videos of children will no longer be regarded in Europe as constitution sexual exploitation and will be exempt from all sanctions. (Marie-Victoire Louis, "Legalising Pimping, Dutch Style," Le Monde Diplomatique, 8 March 1997)
 

Kappo

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2000
2,381
0
0
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: Kappo
In all fairness, I think his punishment is fitting. Now if we could just get people who actually physically abuse children to get as much time.... I had a local story about a 32 year old guy that raped a 9 year old and got 6 years to serve.

I agree. Your anecdote is actually not uncommon at all. First-time sex offenders here in WA are often given a diversion program that only requires them to serve 6 months in confinement. I have seen that deal offered to an offender who had committed oral sex on a 2-year-old.

This is a topic I get pretty passionate about (I once sent a guy to prison for life for child molestation), but on balance 15 years strikes me as being on the high side for taking photos of a sleeping girl. I find these kinds of mandatory minimum sentences a little scary, in that they inhibit any kind of judicial discretion.

Here is the kicker. A friend of mine got a FIRST OFFENSE auto theft charge. He was sentenced to 15 years. He did 5. The child molester, AT MOST, did one more year than someone who stole a car. I dont know if he made parole or not.

Personally, I dont care how much someone wasnt hurt. If you use a child for any kind of sexual fantasy or commit a crime against any child, I think the penalty should be removing at least 15 years of thier life. I dont care WHO it is.

I dont even have a child of my own, so I can imagine what I would think if I DID have children ;)
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
I'm not getting drawn into your silliness, Alchemize.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of a family values advocate being busted for child pornography. I don't see that as a partisan issue.

As I have said above, I have enthusiastically prosecuted child molesters in the past, and child pornographers as well. I am politically liberal. Does this make ME a hypocrite? Of course not. I am capable of at least a bit of nuance in perception, and have the brains not to let my political leanings decide every issue for me.

I have never been to the Netherlands, and don't pretend to be an expert on it. You are the one who brought it up in the first place. Again, I gather you are not a member of Interpol, are you? You quoted a 6-year-old article to show what you say is the state of the law in the Netherlands - I have no idea if it is currently true or not (though I doubt it), and I imagine you don't either.

EDIT: Wikipedia says the Netherlands raised the cutoff age for child porn to 18 in 2002 - no idea about enforcement (though I can't imagine they bothered to raise the limit if the ban is unenforced).
 

Kappo

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2000
2,381
0
0
Al, I am about as conservative as you can get. But there is no way you can tell me that
a) this is OK,
b) it has ANYthing to do with which party he votes for.

His post did not imply to me that he was attacking someone because they were a right-winger, but because he was a liar and a hypocrite. How can you preach about something being bad and DO IT YOURSELF? (speaking of Kenny Stevens)

The guy is trailer trash in it's highest form. And so is his "family" for forgiving him.
 

BugsBunny1078

Banned
Jan 11, 2004
910
0
0
hey Im a christian and Ill tell ya something.
Im not perfect either.
Never claimed to be.
SO all this finger pointing
"Look yet another imperfect Christian" isn't proving anything.
Christianity is still the truth and still the way to salvation and the guy may be a sinner and going to Jail but he is still forgiven and still going to heaven and you're probably not.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
hey Im a christian and Ill tell ya something.
Im not perfect either.
Never claimed to be.
SO all this finger pointing
"Look yet another imperfect Christian" isn't proving anything.
Christianity is still the truth and still the way to salvation and the guy may be a sinner and going to Jail but he is still forgiven and still going to heaven and you're probably not.

You may be right, but, to be clear, I don't think I said anything in any way disrespectful of his faith. I must say it seems a little presumptuous to me to assume that a child pornographer who affiliates himself with a pro-faith group is necessarily a decent Christian man. If he's unequivocally forgiven just because he has a paper affiliation with the American Family Association, then, in the immortal words of Ned Flanders, heaven must be "easier to get into than Arizona State."
 

Kappo

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2000
2,381
0
0
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
hey Im a christian and Ill tell ya something.
Im not perfect either.
Never claimed to be.
SO all this finger pointing
"Look yet another imperfect Christian" isn't proving anything.
Christianity is still the truth and still the way to salvation and the guy may be a sinner and going to Jail but he is still forgiven and still going to heaven and you're probably not.

I may not go to "heaven", but I wont recieve an a$$ probe by someone called "Bigun" during my stay in a prison for engaging in criminal behavior, either.

I think you should put that Christianity is the way for YOU. It is not the way for me. I am happy that you know this guy's internal belief system, though.

Why is it that everyone thinks he is attacking christians or conservatives? The guy screwed up! He deserves every bit of torment he gets. He blathers on about how porn is wrong, but then does some crap like this? WTF hypocrite.

I personally am not a pro-porn kinda guy, so this kind of thing is just bad in general to me. I dont get why someone would take up for him. You can love all you want, and you can put your child in a dark room with him under no supervision. Ill stick to my beliefs that he is scum and a liar.