I don't see how this is even possible, he was not on US soil so US laws do not apply, correct me if im wrong here.
Although I must admit the US is more than arrogant enough to think its laws apply world wide.
Thanks for citing a source.
If that's the accurate description, if a weapon of mass destruction is defined as "any explosive...", then in that case, the war in Iraq was fully justified because Saddam had grenades!!!
Call the New York Times, Saddam DID have weapons of mass destruction! HOLY S***, STOP THE PRESSES!
*Edit* Wait, that's just for grenades with chemical charges
*Edited edit* Wait wtf does that definition even mean? The "legalese" is astounding.
So according to US criminal law then there were weapons of mass destruction in Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Who would have known? Thanks 2timer for pointing this out and I'll be sure to cite it every time some pissy little lefty cries about it.
Since when do US laws apply to other nations?
I don't see how this is even possible, he was not on US soil so US laws do not apply, correct me if im wrong here.
Although I must admit the US is more than arrogant enough to think its laws apply world wide.