Ameesh's Question of the Week (7/11/03)

[Ameesh]

is luvly a bot?

 

[blackdogdeek]

aren't we all bots?

 

[Encryptic]

Originally posted by: Ameesh
is luvly a bot?

Why do you ask? I voted No, BTW.

 

[djheater]

Originally posted by: William of Occam
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

And the corollary, one shouldn't attribute to malice what stupidity can adequately explain.

 

[Fausto]

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: William of Occam
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

And the corollary, one shouldn't attribute to malice what stupidity can adequately explain.

Nice. :beer:

 

[OREOSpeedwagon]

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: William of Occam
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

And the corollary, one shouldn't attribute to malice what stupidity can adequately explain.

:Q

 

[Ameesh]

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: William of Occam
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

And the corollary, one shouldn't attribute to malice what stupidity can adequately explain.

where?

 

[djheater]

Originally posted by: Ameesh

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: William of Occam
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

And the corollary, one shouldn't attribute to malice what stupidity can adequately explain.

where?

here

 

[Ameesh]

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: Ameesh

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: William of Occam
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

And the corollary, one shouldn't attribute to malice what stupidity can adequately explain.

where?

here

we've all seen contact k thanks

 

[FeathersMcGraw]

You realize if the vote splits 50/50, she passes the Turing Test.

 

[djheater]

Originally posted by: Ameesh

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: Ameesh

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: William of Occam
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

And the corollary, one shouldn't attribute to malice what stupidity can adequately explain.

where?

here

we've all seen contact k thanks

Your cultural literacy was never in question. Having seen Contact does not make my point less valid.

 

[Ameesh]

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: Ameesh

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: Ameesh

Originally posted by: djheater

Originally posted by: William of Occam
one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

And the corollary, one shouldn't attribute to malice what stupidity can adequately explain.

where?

here

we've all seen contact k thanks

Your cultural literacy was never in question. Having seen Contact does not make my point less valid.

which one?