Candoman wrote:
"I second that. 2.2GHz Northwood will wipe the floor with the XP 2000+ quite easily, I'm pretty sure."
Better rethink that. The 2.2GHz Northwood is easily beaten by the 1900+ XP in many, many areas. The 2000+ XP will only increase that lead and bring the two so close in other areas as to be negliglible. Thus, the only consideration left is cost. $350 against $660 or so. Hmm, a tough choice.
"Combine it with the upcoming VIA P4X333 chipset, and U will get performance far superior the the AMD platform."
LOL... Pray tell how you ever got the idea VIA was leading the performance arena. P4X266 was plagued with issues (besides being a rogue chipset in the first place) and I wouldn't touch P4X266A with a ten foot pole -- especially when it is clearly beaten (as are all other current P4 chipsets) by the spectacular SiS 645.
"Northwood will eradicate the low performance issue found in Willamete, and be on top."
That's what I had hoped; but, alas, Northwood is doing no better than 5-10% faster than Willamette at the same clock.
"Sigh. Yes, I have to agree that Northwood's price will be way too high... Twice more... Yes, Athlon XP is a better value than Northwood, but the performance will be clearly lower."
"Clearly" is a matter of opinion. From what I've seen, there is no "clear" winner -- they're both on each others' ass. Although, as I said, the 1900+ XP already bests the 2.2GHz Northwood in many areas. And the 2000+ XP will only widen the gap.
Intel is going to have better. Much better. Because Thoroughbred, Barton, and Hammer are at hand.