AMD server roadmap, 28nm in H2 2014

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by boxleitnerb, Dec 3, 2012.

  1. boxleitnerb

    boxleitnerb Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,596
    Likes Received:
    0
    A new AMD server roadmap has popped up:

    [​IMG]

    28nm introduction seems quite late. I wonder how AMD thinks they can compete with 14nm CPUs then? If this is any indication for the desktop segment, it surely doesn't look good.
     
  2. elitejp

    elitejp Senior member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    966
    Likes Received:
    2
    ok ...serious question? Does shrinking the cpu really make any difference for a desktop? I mean theres more than enough real estate on the mobo and in the case to increase the size of the cpu
     
  3. ShadowVVL

    ShadowVVL Senior member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    0
    yeah if it takes amd unit 2014 for 28 nm it is bad.
     
  4. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,060
    Likes Received:
    7
    You also get power savings. IB saw a 20% drop in power consumption with an unoptimized uarch for the process. And thats even with uarch improvements, higher speedbin and bigger iGPU. Not to mention the direct manufactoring cost savings.

    The same timeframe on the Intel side is the release of Haswell-E/EP/EX on 22nm in H2 2014.
     
    #4 ShintaiDK, Dec 3, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2012
  5. mrmt

    mrmt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,976
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think you are confounding the IHS with the die, which aren't the same thing. The chip itself is more or less the size of a coin, or a paper clip in the case of IVB. Die size for the form factor isn't really the issue.

    For the consumer and servers smaller dies brings less power consumption, which is far more important for the customers, as they are the critical variable for TCO and are the critical variable for the form factor.

    For the manufacturer die size is important as the COGS is a direct function of wafer costs and yields.

    What really caught my attention is that this roadmap isn't mentioning anything related to steamroller, something they should be doing if they had plans for the architecture. It seems that the rumors of cancellation of Steamroller and Kaveri were in part true. AMD did indeed cancel Bulldozer projects, but they are fielding something else.
     
  6. sontin

    sontin Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Messages:
    3,016
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess there was a reason at all that AMD is paying 1 Billion to get out of the agreement with GF...
     
  7. Soulkeeper

    Soulkeeper Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2001
    Messages:
    6,261
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was reading about the loongson CPUs on wiki.
    It seems they were planning 28nm 16 core, integrated imc, integrated graphics, 20 watt, etc. for 2012
    Apparently the loongson platforms use VIA and AMD chipsets and have all the standard addons like realtech gigabit ethernet, sata, usb, etc.

    Will this be a serious contender ?
    possibly fabbed at global foundries ?
     
    #7 Soulkeeper, Dec 3, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2012
  8. beginner99

    beginner99 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,810
    Likes Received:
    2
    I thought they skip 28 nm completely (AFAIK payed GF a large penalty for that). So these new server chips could be 20 nm or maybe the make the direct jumps to maybe TSMC 16nm finFET (which should be available in Q1 2014).

    there is another thread somewhere with a link to an article. Basically certain companies believe 28 nm to 20 nm jump is not really worth it and might skip 20 nm. Considering that AMD has a lack of resources to quickly create new uArch it will take longer till the have steamroller and hence they just skip those proccess nodes. IMHO would make sense.

    This would also explain why there is no SteamRoller APU in 2013. Looks like they design steamroller for 16nm finFET and hence also no APUs base son it before 2014.
     
  9. Idontcare

    Idontcare Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    21,130
    Likes Received:
    0
    In fairness this is their server roadmap, and if you compare to Intel's server roadmap the process-node vs. release year timeline isn't so badly matched.

    Intel only just recently released 32nm SB xeons. They won't be releasing 22nm XEONS until something like Q3 2013. And 14nm XEONs will not come any sooner than 2yrs after that.
     
  10. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,060
    Likes Received:
    7
    I think this is what you are looking for:
    [​IMG]

    Roughly, 14nm Broadwell Xeons in summer 2015.

    However, AMD will also only release 1P server CPUs in H2 2014 as well. And those are run on the desktop style timeschedule. Aka the Xeons v2 today. That sounds to me like the desktop AMD will also only be 28nm in 2014, competiting with 14nm Broadwell.
     
    #10 ShintaiDK, Dec 3, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2012
  11. Tuna-Fish

    Tuna-Fish Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    770
    Likes Received:
    2
    Those are MIPS cpus. They don't see much use outside really small niches. I doubt they could take significant share in anything that's not subsidized by the Chinese government.
     
  12. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,060
    Likes Received:
    7
    They are making their way into routers. But thats mainly at the expense of ARM.
     
  13. Soulkeeper

    Soulkeeper Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2001
    Messages:
    6,261
    Likes Received:
    0
    They are MIPs yes.
    Many linux distros support them, they are apparently popular in china.
    Also they have some kinda hardware that allows them to execute x86 binaries at 70% native speed according to wiki.
     
  14. jones377

    jones377 Senior member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2004
    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    0
    This pretty much confirms the leaked desktop roadmap earlier. No steamroller in 2013.
     
  15. beginner99

    beginner99 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,810
    Likes Received:
    2
    lol. I missed the very small legend at the bottom-right of the picture.
     
  16. Ajay

    Ajay Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bizarre, AMD has 20nm in the legend (in red) but nothing in the roadmap :confused:

    I can't believe that AMD thinks they can release something at 28nm in that time frame and expect anything but trivial server sales. If they seriously plan on staying in the big core x86 market at that time, they need to go to 20nm or go home. AMD needs to skip a half node.

    I suppose the a big problem is that design costs for 28nm are already sunk. Wouldn't they be able to write off those costs completely if they weren't able to launch that product (I'm no accountant, so hopefully someone else will comment about the financial side).

    I wonder if leaking a Roadmap is just a 'confidence' play?

    Edit: didn't see beginner99's post for some reason.
     
    #16 Ajay, Dec 3, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2012
  17. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,060
    Likes Received:
    7
    The 20nm avaliable might only be useful for very low power devices in that timeframe.
     
  18. Ajay

    Ajay Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    GF was going to have a 20nm SHP process, supposedly around that time frame, but I'm sure the LP/SLP would come first and GFs roadmaps wouldn't bother with such distinctions as they want to look like a top of the line fab. It's really sad that GF can't guarantee 20nm SHP sometime in 2014 - so AMD is put in a worse cash position by paying GloFlo not to make wafers for them D:
     
  19. Idontcare

    Idontcare Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    21,130
    Likes Received:
    0
    More than likely it is an Excel embedded table within a powerpoint slide. I use them too. In that case they have chosen to format the embedded view for powerpoint to obscure the rest of the table, but if you had the power point file you would just double-click it and it would pop up in edit format and you'd see the rest (likely the 20nm comes in circa 2016).

    But the legend is mean to be universal, so it doesn't take away the 20nm just because the view is obscured.
     
  20. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,060
    Likes Received:
    7
    Remember GF and TSMC uses factory roadmaps. Thats why they never match with product releases.
     
  21. Ajay

    Ajay Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2001
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ah, add another item to why I hate PowerPoint ;)
    Good point anyways.

    It's really amazing. I know that GF has already run various test packages @ 20nm, and read a rumor somewhere of them running some ARM SoCs (no word on how they came out) and yet we'll not see a high performance 20nm product till 2016 :rolleyes:

    Seems like @ 16nm & > everyone will be using fewer processes/node and just use voltage to move things along the frequency curve.

    AMD must be banking on a significantly improved economy in 2014/15 to get back into the business of running low volume server/desktop CPUs. They better have something really special ready...SR will show about as well as BD did. Maybe they'll actually be able to roll in EX. <sigh>
     
  22. tweakboy

    tweakboy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    9,498
    Likes Received:
    1
    A year and half late there.... on the fab Haswell will be on will be 22nm and its 1Q 2013. thx gl
     
  23. NostaSeronx

    NostaSeronx Golden Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    8
    [​IMG]

    Fixed it for you guys.[​IMG]
     
  24. AtenRa

    AtenRa Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    11,245
    Likes Received:
    26
    They will stay five years in 32/28nm ???? no way.
    They barely can compete with 32nm XEONs now at 32nm SOI, no way they will compete at 28nm BULK or SOI against 22nm FinFet in 2013-2014.
     
  25. NostaSeronx

    NostaSeronx Golden Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    8
    Don't trust AMD Roadmaps so often particularly the Enterprise/Sever roadmaps.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    #25 NostaSeronx, Dec 3, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2012