I'm gonna be a bit lazy and just post my Twitter post instead of downloading both images onto my phone and then uploading them here.
+50-60% gains over Vega at 15W (AKA would even surpass a fully maxed out stock 5700G iGPU by 10-20%). And as a reminder, Rembrandt boasts 2-3x the compute throughput of Van Gogh here (2x with the latter at 1.5GHz, 3x with the latter at 1GHz).
The future looks bright for Rembrandt if you ask me personally.
Aya NEO here uses quad-channel LPDDR4X-4266.It's using LPDDR5-5500 Quadchannel right? Over the typical DDR4-3200 Dualchannel it's a major bandwidth uplift over Vega iGPU, this needs to be said.
It also runs a bit worse on Linux vs Windows in general.Doom Eternal is probably the title that will show the biggest performance difference between Vega and RDNA2. Doom Eternal didn't really like Vega while it runs exceptionally well on RDNA2.
Aya NEO here uses quad-channel LPDDR4X-4266.
In both instances bus width is 128b, difference in memory bandwidth is like 30%.
Yeah, and? It's running at 15W (or potentially lower, but there's a rather slim chance of that) and spitting out 25W+ Vega 8 iGPU w/LPDDR4X performance.Ok but isn't it using a Ryzen 5 4500U only which uses Vega 6 running at 1500 Mhz?
Yeah, and? It's running at 15W (or potentially lower, but there's a rather slim chance of that) and spitting out 25W+ Vega 8 iGPU w/LPDDR4X performance.
Or in other words, nearly matching Tiger Lake at 28W+ whilst needing half that power itself. It's a plenty good showing either way. And again, we already know Rembrandt will come with vastly higher compute throughput.
40% more TFLOPs? Not only is it 6CUs vs 8CUs and identical max boost clocks - aka 33% higher theoretical TFLOPs, you're assuming that the 1.5GHz max GPU boost clock on both devices is sustained, which is a huge mistake of an assumption to be making for a 15W iGPU. Even at a low clock of 1500MHz. The 4500U typically sustains 1200-1450MHz at this power.Steam Deck has 40% more tflops +30% more bandwidth than the Vega powered device and gets 50% more performance out of it according to you. It doesn't look that great to me considering it's RDNA-2 based. A comparison with dualchannel based iGPU devices isn't fair against quadchannel, such a comparison is flawed.
40% more TFLOPs? Not only is it 6CUs vs 8CUs and identical max boost clocks - aka 33% higher theoretical TFLOPs, you're assuming that the 1.5GHz max GPU boost clock on both devices is sustained, which is a huge mistake of an assumption to be making for a 15W iGPU. Even at a low clock of 1500MHz. The 4500U typically sustains 1200-1450MHz at this power.
I had read just the opposite, that it is replaceable but is a non-typical but standard NVMe form factor and is not easy to replace.He said that the NVME is not upgradable, so they really have 3 PCB versions then... I kinda get it, otherwise it would be better to just get the eMMC version with the empty M.2 slot. They are also overpricing that NVME like hell, a 1TB NVME is what? $100? a $150?
The part where we all win, is that the Steam Deck will shift a lot of attention to gaming on Linux.
BTW, seeing the performance there, i take everything i said about the screen resolution back, at 15W there is no room for more resolution.
I don't get where he's getting that non-upgradeable bit from. Valve themselves have stated that the M.2 drives are "standard" 2230 devices. It may not be easy to source them, but, according to them, it's possible. I'm very interested in the Steamdeck, but, if the user can't upgrade or REPLACE a failed drive, it's a hard no, as I can get similar performance from roughly similarly priced laptops that are more upgradeable and have physical keyboards.He said that the NVME is not upgradable, so they really have 3 PCB versions then... I kinda get it, otherwise it would be better to just get the eMMC version with the empty M.2 slot. They are also overpricing that NVME like hell, a 1TB NVME is what? $100? a $150?
The part where we all win, is that the Steam Deck will shift a lot of attention to gaming on Linux.
BTW, seeing the performance there, i take everything i said about the screen resolution back, at 15W there is no room for more resolution.
Yeah I thought the Steam Deck was 1.5GHz on max iGPU clock yesterday when it's actually 1.6GHz max clock. So that's my bad.Yes 40% more tflops, Steam Deck GPU has 1.6 tflops according to various sources versus 1.15 tflops from Vega 6. And sure I have to assume both are running at max boost. That's a very rough estimate and the fps comparison is also a rough one.
It is possible that the units were using Engineering Samples.I'm the only one thinking that Valve limited the performance during these hands-on? Linus unit was with SMT disabled, and showing 1GB allocated VRAM.
I suspect that Valve tweaked some things to perform worse but acceptable, maybe to give a better impression on heat and battery life?
They are indeed engineering samples. In the same video you can see the name of the chip, it's the good ol AMD standard for engineering samples: AMD ENG Sample 100-000000405.It is possible that the units were using Engineering Samples.
But today 4T is becoming too little, that's why the AYA competitor uses a 6T(6C) CPU, those extra 2 cores are useful.SMT off can improve performance in some cases while also saving power. It's very situational.