AMD position on GPUs in a CPU socket

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/...ccelerators_in_CPU_Sockets_Make_No_Sense.html

Interesting since they believe that Fusion is a perfect solution. So half CPU, half GPU is great, but a full GPU in a CPU socket is not. I do not follow their logic. I think they just might be trying to down play Knights Ferry.
AMD needs mass market chips. Knight's Ferry is not that. They are downplaying it, but they are also right. The masses will benefit more from faster GPUs, and beefier AVX extensions (not that I like Intel's handling of them, but c'est la vie). Even an Atom core is high-performance compared to what they have in Knight's Ferry.

AMD needs to be able to have one design, with a reliability-tweaked server variant, power-tweaked mobile variant, and give desktop CPUs the middle leftovers. Spreading that out over more than a low-power (Bobcat++) and a high-performance (BD++) chip will be too thin (it may be that even that is too thin).

NVidia has much more to be concerned with, when it comes to Knight's Ferry. Intel has hardware cache coherency and fast caches to counter Tesla's FLOPS.
 

IntelUser2000

Elite Member
Oct 14, 2003
8,686
3,787
136
The way they were first showing it, I got confused too. For some time I was quite sure they were moving to CPU socket using QPI.

Knights Corner isn't in any way a GPU(the texture units in original Larrabee was taken out and they enhanced DP FP throughput) so maybe AMD is referring to someone else, perhaps Nvidia?
 

Phynaz

Lifer
Mar 13, 2006
10,140
819
126
Lol, Torrenza "makes no sense". Took them this long to figure it out?