There are some leaks floating around indicating that AMD is going to re-release the 7950 and 7850 as the R9 280 and R7 265, respectively.
http://www.techpowerup.com/197786/amd-also-works-on-radeon-r9-280-to-heat-up-sub-300-segment.html
http://chinese.vr-zone.com/101020/a...tx-750-ti-and-make-radeon-280-stanby-02112014
Contrary to what TPU says, it's almost certain that the R9 280 will be snapped up by cryptocurrency miners, as the 7950 has been. AMD is seemingly planning to release the R7 265 at a MSRP of $150 and the R9 280 at MSRP of $250, but while the Pitcairn card might well keep that price at street level, you probably won't be able to touch a R9 280 for less than $350, until and unless the bubble pops.
It seems odd that AMD would put the Pitcairn silicon in the R7 category. Both of the existing Pitcairn rebrands (270 and 270X) are R9s, and until now the de facto difference between the R7 and R9 is the number of ROPs (16 vs 32), and this branding breaks that correlation.
http://www.techpowerup.com/197786/amd-also-works-on-radeon-r9-280-to-heat-up-sub-300-segment.html
http://chinese.vr-zone.com/101020/a...tx-750-ti-and-make-radeon-280-stanby-02112014
Contrary to what TPU says, it's almost certain that the R9 280 will be snapped up by cryptocurrency miners, as the 7950 has been. AMD is seemingly planning to release the R7 265 at a MSRP of $150 and the R9 280 at MSRP of $250, but while the Pitcairn card might well keep that price at street level, you probably won't be able to touch a R9 280 for less than $350, until and unless the bubble pops.
It seems odd that AMD would put the Pitcairn silicon in the R7 category. Both of the existing Pitcairn rebrands (270 and 270X) are R9s, and until now the de facto difference between the R7 and R9 is the number of ROPs (16 vs 32), and this branding breaks that correlation.
