Hey all. I'm looking to build a budget server for testing and possibly some file serving as well. I haven't been in the AMD scene for quite awhile and was wondering if the Phenom still had enough teeth to compete with the newer cpus from AMD. I can get all three combos for around $150, but I have no idea which would be better for a simple server. Thanks for any help!
My money is on the 450. That clock speed advantage is going to be impossible for the other chips to over come, and IMHO it hits a nice spot between power usage and performance when it comes to AMD offerings.
The 3400 is just so sticking slow... and the 9850 is too power hungry, and again, it has such lower clock speed that in many situations (like re-encoding, for example) that extra core is going to only maybe get it to the same through put as the 450, while certainly using much more juice. The A4 is attractive in that is going to be a very power efficient chip while having enough grunt to all basic tasks.
If you could fit an A6 (or A8) into your budget, then I don't think it would be a contest.
450 - x3 45 nm, 3.2 Ghz - 95W TDP
9850 BE - x4 65 nm, 2.5 Ghz - 125W TDP
A4 -3400 - x2 32 nm, 2.7 Ghz - 65W TDP
I think you'll find a much wider selection of AM3+ boards as well, and the 880G (or similar graphics) will be fine for a server, negating one of the attractions of the A4.
In reality, they should all be fine. The A4 will likely have the motherboard with the most bells & whistles, since the FM1 chip set is simply more full featured.
I don't think that any of these choices would be wrong, FWIW. The old Phenom would be the least optimal choice, IMHO.