Hi all,
So I have the rig in the sig below.
I bought a 555 BE. Unlocked, but was NOT stable on 4 cores (could boot into windows but not stable). Is stable on 3 cores (core 3 disabled). Can OC to 3.6 with Hyper 212+ HSF.
Am doing a build for a friend and bought a 560 BE. Through it into my rig out of curiousity. Same thing - unlocked but could NOT boot into Windows on 4 cores. Is stable on 3 cores (core 4 disabled). Can OC to 3.8 with Hyper 212+HSF.
So, questions/thoughts on the following:
1) Is it just coincidence, that on my experience with 2 very similar chips in the same system, that a 4th core was detected, but in each case, system not stable with 4 cores, but is stable with 3 cores? Or could this point to another issue I'm overlooking? My gut is telling me it'd be pretty rare to get two chips each stable with 3 cores, but unstable with 4 cores.
2) Should I expect (as I have done) to be able to overclock the 560 BE higher than the 555 BE?
Thanks for your thoughts!
So I have the rig in the sig below.
I bought a 555 BE. Unlocked, but was NOT stable on 4 cores (could boot into windows but not stable). Is stable on 3 cores (core 3 disabled). Can OC to 3.6 with Hyper 212+ HSF.
Am doing a build for a friend and bought a 560 BE. Through it into my rig out of curiousity. Same thing - unlocked but could NOT boot into Windows on 4 cores. Is stable on 3 cores (core 4 disabled). Can OC to 3.8 with Hyper 212+HSF.
So, questions/thoughts on the following:
1) Is it just coincidence, that on my experience with 2 very similar chips in the same system, that a 4th core was detected, but in each case, system not stable with 4 cores, but is stable with 3 cores? Or could this point to another issue I'm overlooking? My gut is telling me it'd be pretty rare to get two chips each stable with 3 cores, but unstable with 4 cores.
2) Should I expect (as I have done) to be able to overclock the 560 BE higher than the 555 BE?
Thanks for your thoughts!
