AMD Framepacing Driver 13.8 review

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

24601

Golden Member
Jun 10, 2007
1,683
40
86
No, the graphs only show that minimum frametimes are limited, the graphs don't say ANYTHING about when these frames are rendered or when they are displayed. As soon as there is some actual evidence of this, I'm all ears. When you're just saying anecdotally "I can easily see the ~5ms delay in the frame being displayed" then it's just silly.

Guess that's the difference between getting called a hacker in a FPS and screaming at your computer that someone's a hacker because they couldn't possibly have noticed your camouflage flicker slightly in the distance.

Also, feigning ignorance is only cool to do when you're not wrong. Otherwise you are literally a tool, in the definitive sense (being used).

Infraction issued for personal attack.
-- stahlhart
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Leadbox

Senior member
Oct 25, 2010
744
63
91
Guess that's the difference between getting called a hacker in a FPS and screaming at your computer that someone's a hacker because they couldn't possibly have noticed your camouflage flicker slightly in the distance.

Also, feigning ignorance is only cool to do when you're not wrong. Otherwise you are literally a tool, in the definitive sense (being used).

Please tone it down a bit, don't want this thread locked now do we?

There have been some theories that AMD’s attempt to reign in stuttering would result in a noticeable increase in input lag, similar to what happens with V-Sync enabled. In our experience, that didn’t happen. When using a corded mouse, input lag wasn’t adversely affected, nor were there any secondary issues like artifacts or rendering errors.
 

stahlhart

Super Moderator Graphics Cards
Dec 21, 2010
4,273
77
91
What is it exactly about video card drivers that brings out so much hostility in so many of you? Please debate respectfully.
-- stahlhart
 

Vesku

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2005
3,743
28
86
So not as smooth as SLI but from reading the conclusions of multiple reviews it was good enough to not be noticeable visually to any of those reviewers.

Anyone read a review that mentioned remaining visually noticeable problems versus SLI?

Seems like the biggest outstanding issue is that the changes aren't yet applied to Eyefinity setups.
 

x3sphere

Senior member
Jul 22, 2009
722
24
81
www.exophase.com
I tried it with Crysis 3 just now, and it's a clear improvement over just using Radeon Pro to limit frame rate. Almost felt as fluid as single card, given the same FPS, to me. Still room for improvement but it's a massive step forward.
 

Meekers

Member
Aug 4, 2012
156
1
76
If these drivers get AMD to the point where the user can not perceive microstutter does it matter that NVIDIA has less? Is there any perceived difference in improving it further?

Reviewers seem to be going nuts with FCAT and graphs. Assuming AMD finishes extending this to eyefinity/dx9 does FCAT become a simple pass/fail check on future benchmarks to make sure the problem is not coming back, or are we going to still see it as a major part of reviews?
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
Looks like a gigantic improvement. As long as I can't actually see the few remaining hiccups I'm a happy man. End-user experience has been, is, and will always be far more important than any series of graphs.

At least now I don't have to bother firing up RadeonPro when I game. Well done, AMD!
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Of course it wouldn't be that easy...

Installed drivers and am now having my second card idle at 500/150.

Yes, there is only one monitor connected.

I don't even know where to start to figure this one out. My second non-used card is running hotter than my primary card.

Good job AMD! :thumbsup:
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
My second card is zero cored out, working as intended for me!

Check your OC software. Main card at 300/150.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Yeah...something is wrong. I can't even disable CFX now.

Good times! Let's reinstall these bad boys.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Haha, okay, so I removed drivers, made sure nothing is running outside of Steam.

Reinstalled drivers, now I can't enable CFX.

Haha. Balla did you use the leaked drivers or the official download from AMD.com?

EDIT: Rebooted PC. CFX is on now, can't disable it, and second core is idling at 500/150, first card is normal at 300/150.

Outside of a complete system reformat, no idea what is going on here.

Off to try the leaked drivers.
 
Last edited:

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
I used the leaked drivers :|

Is there a difference?

I'm overclocking my main card with my second shut off, playing some more casual games, also been downlocking it to 800MHz and undervolting it into the dirt.... No huge issues, though sometimes I get your problem and have the flip AB on and off for ULPS and unofficial OC mode, reboot reinstall, fun stuff that everyone enjoys. Also I have to tab out and move the powertune on the second card otherwise it throttles at stock (I can't adjust voltage on it).

AMD - Where concessions are made everyday ;)
 
Last edited:

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
I used the leaked drivers :|

Is there a difference?

Doesn't seem like it. I've uninstalled them, cleaned registry, rebooted, and the same issues happen on my end:

Install -> can't turn on CFX, reboot, CFX on but can't be turned off.

First card clocks - 300/150
Second card clocks - 500/150

Not sure what I'm doing wrong/different.

EDIT: Screw it, gonna try the other downloads 13.4 on their website.
 
Last edited:

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
I'll give that a shot next. I just installed 13.4 WHQL, all is fine. Second card is off.

Guess ill try removing OC software and give it another shot.

EDIT: Real quick while I remove 13.4, Balla do you remember if your screen did the usual "off/on/off/on" sequence when installing the 13.8s? Installing the 13.4s did the usual sequence but I noticed when I installed the 13.8s the screen never went off.
 
Last edited: