I knew I'd get flamed for this thread...
Which just goes to show that you must
like people bashing you.
...but it really had to be done with as many pages that some of the regulars here have ranted on about ATI being a marriage with AMD.
***taps shoulder***, um....yeah, those were in threads discussing the AMD/ATI merger bub. Kinda related then, not so much here. Yours was really just an example of your A.D.H.D ramblings.
Yet theres nothing wrong with pointing out how AMD is referencing ATI as "formerly", at all.
There's also nothing useful in it. Other than you, who cares what they call it?
But theres a lot of people here fighting for the memory of ATI, and the company is just gone.
If you know the people, PM them. I just don't see a logical reason to turn everyone's attention to your drama dance about what they're going to call it.
Though I agree that pretending ATI exists as it did before for one more round with R600 is kinda fun. The game really is over after that..
So you're saying it's gone but not yet?
AMDs running the show now, and that can only mean improvements.
Yeah, because the X1900 was so much worse than the X8 series. God, they haven't been improving
anything. :roll:
The hatchet needs buried in ATIs memory and only AMD itself will convince these guys.
You're right. So why did you make the thread again? If even you say that "only AMD itself will convince these guys" then what is the point of your thread?
Theres nothing wrong with becoming AMD supporters, but ATI as you knew it is gone..
I have nothing against AMD, unless they produce the same quality of support as I experienced with the former ATI.
And there you have it ladies and gentlemen, the reason why Crusader made his self-admitted worthless thread: So that if AMDs GPUs are better than Nvidias he can say that he bought an
AMD one instead of admitting he purchased something made by
ATI.
Your just as pathetic as you are childish. Grow up and stop trying to invoke arguments about
names.