Wow, I think the draw calls did improve.
Previously at the center square in Novigrad of The Witcher 3. I got around 45-48 fps even with OCed R9 290 (not 100% utilized, CPU bottlenecked). Now I get 51-53fps at the same spot.
No the issues did not exist in dx9. At least not recently. Eyefinity and crossfire worked with dx9 but since the dx11 client launched neither work.
Not a single problem of VSR and FRTC here :sneaky:The amount of issues people are having with the frame rate control and VSR is pathetic. AMD really should have made sure this launch period of Fury was completely polished instead of mistake after mistake. Dunno how people feel confident spending that kind of money when AMD just continues to struggle with simple features.
Not a single problem of VSR and FRTC here :sneaky:
This is part of the reason I didn't purchase the 290x. 1440p VSR limitation isn't worth it as most of the geames I could probably run at 4K. But because VSR is so limited, even BEYOND what AMD publishes, I can't even trust to be able to use the card for it's intended purpose. cool!
Mouse cursor became 2X size after installing the 15.7. Going back to 14.12 fixed.care to elaborate?
Mouse cursor became 2X size after installing the 15.7. Going back to 14.12 fixed.
Never had this and just unistalling the driver fix the bug.Not a Windows scaling issue?
Sorry I worded that extremely poorly in just irritated with amd with this type of stuff at this point. My card is at 1440p with the 7950 despite being clearly able to use 1800p. I'd like to test the 1800p to see if it's worth it to upgrade to a 290. However I don't have the option and it makes me also worried that the option won't show up if I upgrade too. Since I'll get a used card and won't return it (can't) then I really want that 1800 p to work since I can crossfire to use it if necessary.Not sure where you got the idea that the 290x is limited to 1440p in VSR; I have a 290x and I regularly use VSR up to 1800p in Dragonball Xenoverse. Supporting VSR with Southern Islands at all is pretty cool. In practice I don't think it matters that Southern Islands can't push go past 1440p, that's about as high as those cards can go in modern games at playable frame rates.
You're not alone. Tons of people with same issue on guru3d.I guess VSR isn't quite ready, as far as my 7870 is concerned. Installed over the old driver (15.6), then took DDU to it, reinstalled with a new download. I run the Intel onboard driver with Virtu MVP2 for virtualization & QuickSync encoding, took DDU to the Intel driver in the off-chance that was interfering and disabled the iGPU. Still don't have the VSR option. Only thing I haven't tried is installing 15.7 without the Intel driver present, but no time before work...and I doubt it's the problem at the point anyway. Usually don't have problems with driver feature updates until now. FRTC is available but haven't tried that yet.
Never had this and just unistalling the driver fix the bug.
Sorry I worded that extremely poorly in just irritated with amd with this type of stuff at this point. My card is at 1440p with the 7950 despite being clearly able to use 1800p. I'd like to test the 1800p to see if it's worth it to upgrade to a 290. However I don't have the option and it makes me also worried that the option won't show up if I upgrade too. Since I'll get a used card and won't return it (can't) then I really want that 1800 p to work since I can crossfire to use it if necessary.
But I can't test despite amd saying the resolution is there and tons of people are having similar issues with vsr or the frame rate control. Even more annoying the 290 can do 4k with the wagnards tool. This whole situation with vsr and the frame rate control is pathetic.
Is it really that hard for amd to implement these 2 features? Or do I need to always use third party tools to get these features to work more reliably....
I already figure I need to install some third party tools and stop waiting for amd as they'll never give me the stuff I want.
From what I've read, AMD enables VSR through the hardware scaler, and that limits the usable resolutions to what the scaler can be made to support. The scaler in the 285 is newer than the scaler in the 290X, so that's why the 285 supports 4K VSR while the 290X doesn't, even though the 290X is more powerful. The relatively lower VSR resolutions supported on Southern Islands chips is likely because of a similar scaler constraint. So yeah, I guess is kind of is that hard for AMD to implement higher VSR resolutions on cards with scalers that can't support it.