166*16=2656 Which is a good guess, unfortunately the AMD chips are performance rated ie the 2600 is not a real Mhz number, it's the approximate speed it would be if it where an Intel chip.
The real speed is more like what your system is attempting to default too.
The reason for all this malarky is AMD with its hyper-pipelined-jiggery-pokery had Mhz for Mhz a faster chip than Intel. But Intel where acheiving better yields from the manufacturing process or the architecture just lent itself to faster Mhz. Either way Joe Bloggs on the No 10 to Charring Cross was convinced that the more Mhz you had the faster the CPU would run. This would of course be true for like architectures, but they ain't.
Bit Like My 1100cc bike stuffing my mates 3000cc car <vbeg> bigger engine but the architecture or design is totally different so the results aren't what one may suppose.
Lesson over