Originally posted by: nyker96
Looking at 7550/2.5ghz vs E5200/2.5ghz, I can see they are similar and often trade bench wins. Intel faster in games/encoding. AMD faster in general apps. However at burn 7xxx is quite a bit of a energy hog no surprise since it's a essentially quad core with 2 cores disabled. Only if AMD can intro a genuine dual core on new architecture can they win the power consumption aspect. Anyways, I can see going to the new core does buy AMD more performance in the low end sector.
Well financially good move for AMD, recycles defective X4s to something sellable but for end user the power consumption is just too high. Not that most regular user who are not OCing will care about power consumption/heat issues.