- Jul 4, 2005
- 4,064
- 89
- 91
Any takers ?
AMD Athlon 64 X2 7750 2.7GHz 3MB L2 $79.99
Review
Doesn't look to bad based on this review.
AMD Athlon 64 X2 7750 2.7GHz 3MB L2 $79.99
Review
Doesn't look to bad based on this review.
Originally posted by: hans007
$80 is kind of expensive though. you can get a phenom 9500 or a 9550 for barely more than that on ebay.
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: hans007
$80 is kind of expensive though. you can get a phenom 9500 or a 9550 for barely more than that on ebay.
True, but the cheapest used 9550 I'm currently seeing on Ebay is $80 + $10 shipping, plus you need to buy an HSF for it, and it also has a locked multi. The 7750 is new, comes with HSF, has unlocked multi, and has over 20% higher clockspeed, which is more useful in some situations than 4 slower cores. Free shipping on the 7750, too, and I believe there's a HardOCP $5 off code available.
Originally posted by: eternalone
How would this par against th e8400
Originally posted by: razor2025
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: hans007
$80 is kind of expensive though. you can get a phenom 9500 or a 9550 for barely more than that on ebay.
True, but the cheapest used 9550 I'm currently seeing on Ebay is $80 + $10 shipping, plus you need to buy an HSF for it, and it also has a locked multi. The 7750 is new, comes with HSF, has unlocked multi, and has over 20% higher clockspeed, which is more useful in some situations than 4 slower cores. Free shipping on the 7750, too, and I believe there's a HardOCP $5 off code available.
I don't think the black edition for 7750 has heatsink either...
Originally posted by: RaptureMe
I think its 95w cause it is auctully a quad core with 2 cores disabled.
Originally posted by: Phynaz
I just can't seem to get excited about a 95W dual core running at 2.7Ghz.
Cut the power in half then I'll show some interest.
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: eternalone
How would this par against th e8400
Probably not a good comparison - more like an alternative to the e5200/e7200.
For a 65nm 'Kuma' first shot looks pretty good. Chipzilla probably won't break a sweat until AMD moves it to 45nm ...
![]()