Originally posted by: Jeff7181
If you're planning to overclock, get the Winchester. If you just want a fast processor and want to keep your warranty in tact, the Newcastle would be the best choice because a 3200+ Newcastle runs at 2.2 GHz, and the 3200+ Clawhammer and Winchester run at 2.0 GHz. The extra cache of the Clawhammer doesn't really make up for the 200 less MHz.
Originally posted by: Wicked2010
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
If you're planning to overclock, get the Winchester. If you just want a fast processor and want to keep your warranty in tact, the Newcastle would be the best choice because a 3200+ Newcastle runs at 2.2 GHz, and the 3200+ Clawhammer and Winchester run at 2.0 GHz. The extra cache of the Clawhammer doesn't really make up for the 200 less MHz.
All of this is correct except when you say get the NewCastle because it runs at 2.2 GHZ while the Winchester runs at 2.0 GHZ. While this is true... the Winchester 3200+ is still a "faster" and better chip than the NewCastle. Please stop spreading this ignorant rumour that MHZ is all that is needed to determine what chip is better. In the Intel world, MHZ will pretty much tell you what is what... but in the AMD world, it isn't the same. Although they are probably very close in performance, the Winnie is much better since it can produce 3200+ speeds at only a 2.0 GHZ clock. What does this mean? You can overclock it *EASILY*.
Originally posted by: rartech
Thanks for the great posts. So, if I am going to buy a retail version and I don' t overclock it sounds like the Newcastle might be my best choice, right?
