Originally posted by: AdamsJabbar
Originally posted by: DanDaMan315
If this were 939 then it would be smokin. However now that 3000 venice chips are about $125, and can OC to atleast 2.5, this 754 deal isn't as good. Still hot none to less.
For crying out loud...NOT EVERYBODY OVERCLOCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For most folks out there (myself included), they would rather pay the extra 50 bucks for something that is GUARANTEED to run at the speed they want. These are not the days of Intel's $700 Pentium II 450 vs. a $125 Celeron 300A. For guaranteed performance, this is a helluva deal.
Originally posted by: KristopherKubicki
Eh, I think you're better off spending your money on S939. But if not EWiz has a good deal on the same chip:
http://labs.anandtech.com/search.php?q=ADA3700AEP5AR
Kristopher
Care to elaborate on that statement? In Anandtech's own review:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=1
the socket 754 chip performs within fractions of a percentage point of the equivalent socket 939 chip with the same clock speed. I don't see the point in spending 75% more for a S939 chip for less than 1% performance improvement.
If you're referring to upgrading the chip later on, I'd like to see a show of hands of how many people actually upgrade ONLY the CPU in their system without a motherboard upgrade. Furthermore, for a person buying a CPU/motherboard at this moment in time, they probably won't be ready to upgrade the CPU for 6-12 months at the very earliest. At that point, the new DDR2 Athlon 64s will be out and will require a new motherboard anyway.
Like I said, please elaborate.
P.S. Even kamranziadar thought it was a good deal. That dude normally hates everyone else's deals!