Originally posted by: jpeyton
Text
There are things in our universe far beyond human comprehension.
Imagine what the first space explorers will say when they see some of these giants up-close.
Originally posted by: Dunbar
That's nothing, the universe is what, 13.5 billion light years across? I've actually been enjoying the show The Universe. Never really had much interest in this stuff until I saw that show.
edit, it's actually 150 billion light years (so I was off by a few billion...) 13.5 billion is the age of the universe.
What's south of the south pole? The theory is that the Big Bang was an eruption of space and time - causality because of time like we know it didn't exist.Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Dunbar
That's nothing, the universe is what, 13.5 billion light years across? I've actually been enjoying the show The Universe. Never really had much interest in this stuff until I saw that show.
edit, it's actually 150 billion light years (so I was off by a few billion...) 13.5 billion is the age of the universe.
You know what bugs me about that? What was there before the universe?
Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Dunbar
That's nothing, the universe is what, 13.5 billion light years across? I've actually been enjoying the show The Universe. Never really had much interest in this stuff until I saw that show.
edit, it's actually 150 billion light years (so I was off by a few billion...) 13.5 billion is the age of the universe.
You know what bugs me about that? What was there before the universe?
Originally posted by: Jeff7
What's south of the south pole?Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Dunbar
That's nothing, the universe is what, 13.5 billion light years across? I've actually been enjoying the show The Universe. Never really had much interest in this stuff until I saw that show.
edit, it's actually 150 billion light years (so I was off by a few billion...) 13.5 billion is the age of the universe.
You know what bugs me about that? What was there before the universe?
Originally posted by: Jeff7
The theory is that the Big Bang was an eruption of space and time - causality because of time like we know it didn't exist.
Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Dunbar
That's nothing, the universe is what, 13.5 billion light years across? I've actually been enjoying the show The Universe. Never really had much interest in this stuff until I saw that show.
edit, it's actually 150 billion light years (so I was off by a few billion...) 13.5 billion is the age of the universe.
You know what bugs me about that? What was there before the universe?
Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Jeff7
What's south of the south pole?Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Dunbar
That's nothing, the universe is what, 13.5 billion light years across? I've actually been enjoying the show The Universe. Never really had much interest in this stuff until I saw that show.
edit, it's actually 150 billion light years (so I was off by a few billion...) 13.5 billion is the age of the universe.
You know what bugs me about that? What was there before the universe?
Nothing, you are the farthest south you're going to get. Unless you stay there long enough for the magnetic pole to shift, that's it.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
The theory is that the Big Bang was an eruption of space and time - causality because of time like we know it didn't exist.
Ok, so that theory has nothing in existence before the Big Bang? So what caused the Big Bang then - if there was zip, zero, zilch in existence? I realize this isn't an easy question but I feel like that theory is awfully easy to shoot holes in.
Originally posted by: silverpig
Roger Penrose gave a talk at my school a while back and someone I know went to it. He said Penrose put forth an interesting theory of the universe which went like this:
So say the universe evolves for a long long time. One possible "end" to the universe is that all matter turns to energy and the universe is nothing but a huge photon bath. Because everything in the universe is photons moving relativistically, time and space really don't have any scale at all anymore. Thus, you can re-normalize the universe to be a point, and then you get a new big bang.
Originally posted by: SketchMaster
Originally posted by: silverpig
Roger Penrose gave a talk at my school a while back and someone I know went to it. He said Penrose put forth an interesting theory of the universe which went like this:
So say the universe evolves for a long long time. One possible "end" to the universe is that all matter turns to energy and the universe is nothing but a huge photon bath. Because everything in the universe is photons moving relativistically, time and space really don't have any scale at all anymore. Thus, you can re-normalize the universe to be a point, and then you get a new big bang.
Energy could be considered matter, so where did that come from to form the first big bang?
I know that we will never really know for sure, and that is why it bugs me when people say stuff like, "it was always there", if you don't know the answer just say it instead of making up something to smart say.
All explanations are theoretical, and extremely hard to explain to someone who doesn't have some knowledge about space-time and string-theory. Get your feet wet; try wrapping your brain around this video about the first ten dimensions.Originally posted by: JasonCoder
You know what bugs me about that? What was there before the universe?
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Jeff7
What's south of the south pole?Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Dunbar
That's nothing, the universe is what, 13.5 billion light years across? I've actually been enjoying the show The Universe. Never really had much interest in this stuff until I saw that show.
edit, it's actually 150 billion light years (so I was off by a few billion...) 13.5 billion is the age of the universe.
You know what bugs me about that? What was there before the universe?
Nothing, you are the farthest south you're going to get. Unless you stay there long enough for the magnetic pole to shift, that's it.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
The theory is that the Big Bang was an eruption of space and time - causality because of time like we know it didn't exist.
Ok, so that theory has nothing in existence before the Big Bang? So what caused the Big Bang then - if there was zip, zero, zilch in existence? I realize this isn't an easy question but I feel like that theory is awfully easy to shoot holes in.
It's asking a question beyond our experience. It's like asking a blind guy if the blue looks better than the red. All we know is a universe with 3 space dimensions and a time dimension. We think in that manner. It's not really within our ability to conceive of something besides trivial additions and subtractions to that (we can do physics in a 4-D universe easily, we actually DO physics in 1 and 2 dimensions all the time, but we always need time in order to have a before and an after).
Roger Penrose gave a talk at my school a while back and someone I know went to it. He said Penrose put forth an interesting theory of the universe which went like this:
So say the universe evolves for a long long time. One possible "end" to the universe is that all matter turns to energy and the universe is nothing but a huge photon bath. Because everything in the universe is photons moving relativistically, time and space really don't have any scale at all anymore. Thus, you can re-normalize the universe to be a point, and then you get a new big bang.
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Not so Mr. Cho...check out Brine theory and why physicists are starting to believe there are multiple universes floating around as bubbles. When two universes collide their brines mix to create a new universe, with it's own unique laws of physics. Mind blowing stuff.
Precisely my point.Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Nothing, you are the farthest south you're going to get. Unless you stay there long enough for the magnetic pole to shift, that's it.
The theory has "something" in existence. Fritzo was a vowel off - brane theory. Massive structures out there somewhere collide, and the result of this impact is a tiny bubble of spacetime, complete with concretions of energy, and even more densely packed stuff - matter.Ok, so that theory has nothing in existence before the Big Bang? So what caused the Big Bang then - if there was zip, zero, zilch in existence? I realize this isn't an easy question but I feel like that theory is awfully easy to shoot holes in.
