• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Amanda Knox Double Jeopardy

I disagree, she is charged with a crime in their country and needs to answer for it in that country.

if the crime took place in the states you woudl have a point

So you would let a foreign government try you for a crime over and over again until they got the result they wanted?
 
So you would let a foreign government try you for a crime over and over again until they got the result they wanted?

Look at it the other way around. There are some things that are legal in other countries that are illegal here. If you commit that crime on foreign soil, although legal there, you can be prosecuted here for that crime. It works the other way around too. If youre an American on foreign soil, you do not have any constitutional rights. You are subject to the local laws.

How is this a double jeopardy case?
It's not really. Double jeopardy only applies in the US.
 
Look at it the other way around. There are some things that are legal in other countries that are illegal here. If you commit that crime on foreign soil, although legal there, you can be prosecuted here for that crime. It works the other way around too. If youre an American on foreign soil, you do not have any constitutional rights. You are subject to the local laws.


It's not really. Double jeopardy only applies in the US.

I would agree with your premise if she were still in Italy. But since they let her go, it's up to state departments discretion on whether to extradite her (assuming Italy even asks).
 
So you would let a foreign government try you for a crime over and over again until they got the result they wanted?

No I wouldn't be involved with the brutal murder of someone. Especially in a country who's laws dictate you can be subjected to repeated trials.
 
I would agree with your premise if she were still in Italy. But since they let her go, it's up to state departments discretion on whether to extradite her (assuming Italy even asks).

I think we have an extradition treaty with Italy, so it's not just a matter of state department discretion.
 
Italy is a highly corrupt nation with an inferior justice system. There is no way that the US is going to extradite a citizen over this.

IMO Italy can pound sand and Knox would have to be ludicrously stupid to ever go back there.

Btw extradition is always up to discretion. Mark my words the US will not be sending her back unless she wants to go no matter what Italy says.
 
well it doesn't even appear Italy wants or needs her to return.

Only if she is found guilty will they try to extradite.
 
Best two out of three!
Deathbillandted.jpg
 
She probably wishes it worked that way. All Italy has to do is score once - with apparently however many tries they want.

Hence the movie reference.
*Death loses*
"Best 3 out of 5!"
*Death loses again*
Bill&Ted: "Best 4 out of 7?
Death:"You're damned right!"
 
I disagree, she is charged with a crime in their country and needs to answer for it in that country.

if the crime took place in the states you woudl have a point

So if a country has the death penalty for insulting Mohammed and an extradition treaty with the US, you'd be fine if the US sent them back to be killed since the perpetrator "needs to answer for it in that country"?
 
So if a country has the death penalty for insulting Mohammed and an extradition treaty with the US, you'd be fine if the US sent them back to be killed since the perpetrator "needs to answer for it in that country"?

I do not think we, or our government, disagree with the laws against murder. Our real contention is with their legal process.
 
So if terrorists that comitted terrorist acts in the US made their way back to the middle east - say Afghanistan - they were tried and found to be heros there.


If the United States wanted to try them for mass murders, Afghanistan should tell them to pound sand since they are an Afghanistan citizen, and they are no longer in the United States.
 
So if a country has the death penalty for insulting Mohammed and an extradition treaty with the US, you'd be fine if the US sent them back to be killed since the perpetrator "needs to answer for it in that country"?

No I wouldn't, for insulting Mohammed no

for killing someone yes
 
Back
Top