- Nov 8, 2004
- 268
- 0
- 0
I was originally planning to get a laptop with good dedicated video card, such as 7900GS, but lets just say that because of budget cuts/priorities, I decided to stay with either of these 2 integrated cards: Nvidia 6150 (good but integrated) or Intel GMA950 (slowest...but cheapest)
Now, i have been told many times in stores and in different forums that GMA950 can handle Vista well enough. As long as I don't plan to play games (which I dont) GMA950 is good enough and it can handle Vista's eye candy very well.
So yesterday, I was reading Notebook Video Card Guide 2006 at http://www.notebookreview.com/default.a...=3056&guide=Graphics+Card+Guide+2006(I (I was trying to see if Nvidia 7200 was any better than GMA950)...and this is what I see on the website:
You see the underlined part? When I first read it, i had to re-read it 3 or 4 times just to make sure that I got it correctly. So does this actually mean that in order to run Aero Glass interface, I need either ATI 1150 or Nvidia 6150 AT LEAST? Weird, I was told that GMA950 can handle Vista very well, and as long as I dont want to play games, it should be enough.
So my Vista friends, what can you say about this? Who is right? The article or the people who tell otherwise?
You probably think I am making a big deal out of this, but it is really important for me to do my research before I buy a laptop. I want to buy a laptop that I want, not the one that sales clerk is trying to sell.
Thank you in advance
Now, i have been told many times in stores and in different forums that GMA950 can handle Vista well enough. As long as I don't plan to play games (which I dont) GMA950 is good enough and it can handle Vista's eye candy very well.
So yesterday, I was reading Notebook Video Card Guide 2006 at http://www.notebookreview.com/default.a...=3056&guide=Graphics+Card+Guide+2006(I (I was trying to see if Nvidia 7200 was any better than GMA950)...and this is what I see on the website:
WINDOWS VISTA AND THE FUTURE
Everyone's talking about Windows Vista, and they've been for the past couple years. Everyone wants their machine to be fully compatible with it.
Honestly, having played with Windows Vista Beta 2, I feel I can comfortably say that it will indeed be worth the wait, provided you have hardware that can run it in all its glory. This means running the most demanding piece of Vista: Aero Glass.
Aero Glass, for those uninitiated, is a visual style for Vista that adds transparency and other features to the windows. It's VERY attractive in practice, and gives the whole interface a very modern look.
However, it demands a graphics processor with:
* Shader Model 2
* 64MB of Video Memory
So most of you probably think, "Oh, well the GMA 900/950 has those, so it can run it." You're mistaken. Aero Glass will only run on integrated parts at the level of the X200M (1100/1150) or better.
This makes buying a notebook a little bit trickier for some users, as I can't honestly suggest buying a notebook that won't run Aero Glass. Without it, you miss out on a major feature of Vista, and though the changes to it under the hood are much more relevant, it will feel largely like a glorified Windows XP.
You see the underlined part? When I first read it, i had to re-read it 3 or 4 times just to make sure that I got it correctly. So does this actually mean that in order to run Aero Glass interface, I need either ATI 1150 or Nvidia 6150 AT LEAST? Weird, I was told that GMA950 can handle Vista very well, and as long as I dont want to play games, it should be enough.
So my Vista friends, what can you say about this? Who is right? The article or the people who tell otherwise?
You probably think I am making a big deal out of this, but it is really important for me to do my research before I buy a laptop. I want to buy a laptop that I want, not the one that sales clerk is trying to sell.
Thank you in advance
