Ruptga
Lifer
- Aug 3, 2006
- 10,246
- 207
- 106
My question will be: "Hi (candidate name), in your own words (not canned answers) and in about 2-3 minutes, can you tell me/us why I/we should pick you over other candidates?"
The answer to that really is the whole point of the interview process, and you don't want somebody with no self-confidence anyway. I'd ask this after asking how they would troubleshoot an actual persistent bug, but I'd probably boil it down to "tell me how are you better than the average candidate", or maybe "what do you bring to the table that the average (insert profession) doesn't".
Both questions are open-ended, and both questions allow the interviewee to show you their stuff. You're not trying to eliminate candidates, you're trying to get the right one(s) to stand up and announce themselves.
Talk shop, go off script, break the rules. That will help you root out people who are bullshitting versus people who know their shit.
I really hate the behavioural style interviews because for the interviewee it feels like you're being interrogated rather than establishing a professional business relationship. For interviewers, you only really find out whether they've read the script and know how to deliver canned responses.
Also, what he said.
Last edited:
