I guess you set your HT/FSB/whatever you want to call it to 290MHz, then. I mean I don't know, you set it. It's just a RAM divider of 2/3 doesn't allow for an integer CPU frequency when using a HT multiplier of 10 (you get 2899.5... MHz, etc), which absolutely makes no difference.
I mean by HT multiplier what you mean by CPU multiplier. I mean by RAM divider the HT:RAM frequency ratio (which is 2/3). What you mean by RAM divider is the RAM frequence:core frequency ratio, which I'm not used to using, but, sure, it is 15.
Also, good job getting that close to 200MHz. Ideally you could go for 7/10 divider, if that were an option.
I was just a little confused about essentially what your OP was about. So I guess my point now is good job and good luck.
200-300MHz is average for the big Clawhammer cores (the first A64 core). And you're right, my motherboard doesn't help. The only core voltage option is +0.05V, which brings me to 1.60V. I kind of want to see what 1.65V does, if that can push me to 2.3GHz (at this point, with 5/6 or even 1/1 or any RAM divider, 1.6V at HT 230MHz I can't boot into Windows). I mean at HT 220MHz, 5/6 divider I get a RAM clock of 183MHz, which is not as close to 200MHz as I would like. The motherboard is a S754/PCI-E board, just a stop gap so I don't have to use AGP graphics cards. I mean, I don't really need my computer to be faster; it can run pretty much anything (GRAW2, Lost Planet) fine except for the CPU-intensive Flight Simulator X.