- Sep 6, 2000
- 25,383
- 1,013
- 126
Almost 3 years after the fact now, so perhaps it's a bit easier to look at it with an unbiased eye. Not working in the IT field myself, i tend to think that the Y2K affair was a monumental disaster for the IT industry, almost a Waterloo for it in fact. For years, technology spending was channeled from core capability spending into one tiny niche area of interest.
And for their efforts, the IT industry will be living with CEO's and customers who for years will be exceptionally gun-shy about dedicating new resources to technology products and services, since so much got spent on Y2K projects. Banks and financial institutions in particular (whom i believe are the single biggest consumer for the IT industry, at 20% or more of aggregate spending) have been hugely undercapitalizing basic core IT projects for years, and seem to have no interest at all in raising their CAPEX spending on IT.
So i return to my original question. Was Y2K a plus or minus for the technology industry as a whole?
And for their efforts, the IT industry will be living with CEO's and customers who for years will be exceptionally gun-shy about dedicating new resources to technology products and services, since so much got spent on Y2K projects. Banks and financial institutions in particular (whom i believe are the single biggest consumer for the IT industry, at 20% or more of aggregate spending) have been hugely undercapitalizing basic core IT projects for years, and seem to have no interest at all in raising their CAPEX spending on IT.
So i return to my original question. Was Y2K a plus or minus for the technology industry as a whole?