Originally posted by: hysperion
Originally posted by: TheLonelyPhoenix
Originally posted by: hysperion
The reason japanese cars are considered more reliable is because they are driven by a group of people who generally buy them and drive them leisurely. Most American cars are beat to piss and because of that they have a bad reliability rating. Yes the ricer crowd drives their cars the same way but the ricer crowd isn't that big in comparison. There have been plenty of lemon japanese vehicles- Mazda Rx7's for one. It's also true that Japanese cars generally have less innovation. My dad works for Delphi- he summed it up very well as he used to work with GM but now deals with Toyota: GM wants the latest coolest gadgets and Toyota wants a proven technology and generally uses less innovative parts which leads to less issues.
You just contradicted yourself in the same paragraph. You say that Japanese cars are only more reliable because of the people who drive them (which was a stupid enough statement, given the number of riceboys who beat the piss out of their Civics), then you go on to describe how Toyota only chooses the most reliable and proven technologies for their cars while GM shoves in anything that looks good.
You sir, are a moron. Please
stop posting.
Waa Waa Waa did I hit on your parade of mazda that you put in your sig? Mazda makes sh1tty vehicles, look I can link too!
http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/lemon_site/sources.htm ....one of the only vehicles I know of that has it's own website dedicated to it being a complete lemon- the mazda rx7. I never said GM shoves in anything that looks good- I said newer technologies- kinda like how it is with computers.....and in your post you said
"You say that Japanese cars are only more reliable" Read my post again clown- I never said that was the only reason. Way to be an ignorant flamer.
Look man, I can't help the fact you're an idiot.
You said yourself that Toyota and most Japanese car makers use tried-and-true solutions. There is a reason for that: they are RELIABLE.
The fact you used the RX-7 as an example has nothing to do with the fact you are wrong and should cut your testicles off before you pollute the world with your genetics. Mazda is a. owned by Ford and b. shares a good number of parts with Ford and Volvo.
And if you haven't yet found a website dedicated to how much a particular car model sucks beside one on the RX-7, you definitely haven't been looking hard enough. Or perhaps, like a good little fanboi, you just Googled for Japanese lemons in particular and convienently ignored any of the other ones you might have found.
In other words, please disconnect your computer from the Internet and throw it out the nearest window. then follow up with yourself.
As for the OP, you shouldn't be telling anyone to do their research before "running their mouth", and this thread is proof. You have praised a Ford Escort (which uses a Mazda engine) for its reliablity compared to "jap crap", and then made a trolling thread about a Honda recall when Ford and GM have had numerous recalls for fires starting under the hood, exploding gas tanks (and I don't just mean the Pinto), and so forth.
*waits for the inevitable retaliation of personal, unrelated attacks as the OP expresses his suppressed rage from a history of child abuse*