• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

All you warcraft 3 pirates....

after playing it for a while.. i think starcraft and warcraft 2 holds my interest a bit longer. but that can all change though, depending on the mission plays that comes with the game. player vs. player game gets boring fast. it's still in the betas, i am hoping they will somehow change that..
 
if you are playing games where it is just mass units and kill, then you aren't playing with people that know what they are doing....if you come at me with nothing but a bunch of troops, you are in for a beat-down....I think the total opposite is true...with the lower unit limits, utilizing your heroes and other magic-casting units becomes much more important that it did in SC
 


<< there was one time where all the famous top beta ladder players crapped on Blizz for War3 lacking so much depth..

Remember SC? now that's depth in strategy..

War3 now is so linear in strategy.. just mass units.. and kill
>>



Yah, I agree. Starcraft had more strategy. War3 is fun, but I'm not sure if I am going to buy it. Probably leaning towards no (there are a bunch of games that I would want to buy first Dungeon Siege, Never Winter Nights, Moorwind, MOO3) before even considering it.

Oh, and on Starcraft.... Starcraft strategy doesn't even hold a candel to Total Anihilation 😀 (me=TA fanatic who thinks it is the best RTS multiplayer game ever made, even to this day it is fun).
 
Back
Top