All Critics Blast Matrix Revolutions *Major Spoiler Inside*

Ludacris

Senior member
Oct 4, 2001
516
0
0
As for the big-payoff ending -- the equivalent of a Viking funeral -- it reduces the Wachowskis' take on the Judeo-Christian ethic to Hollywood gloss. Cueing the music, the sunshine and the hint of another sequel can't distract us from the fact that nothing is revealed. Neo, dude, you blew it.





The Matrix Revolutions represents a disappointing way for the science fiction trilogy to bow out. Overlong and underwhelming, The Matrix Revolutions reinforces the thinking that it?s a rare movie series in which the final chapter is the strongest. In this installment, the intelligence and ideas that formed one of the cornerstones of the original The Matrix, and were still in evidence in The Matrix Reloaded, have been shunted aside in favor of computer-generated action that makes about 1/3 of this movie look like a video game on the big screen.

The problems with the film are easy enough to pinpoint. It's pretentious (this was true, at least to a degree, of its predecessors) - we're expected to approach this film with the same solemnity that the Wachowski Brothers do. The action is hackneyed - the slo-mo martial arts stuff was neat the first time, but it was already getting old by the time it was re-used in The Matrix Reloaded. Now, it's past the expiration date, and the Wachowskis fail to come up with anything genuinely new or innovative to enhance or improve upon it. The pacing is uneven - the first hour is bogged down with talking and unnecessary exposition; not until the half-way point does the energy level shoot up. And the payoff is weak. Had this been a stand-alone popcorn science fiction adventure, it might have been enjoyable, but this is a poor way to end a trilogy. Expectations built up by the first two films are not fulfilled. One could be forgiven for anticipating something more momentous than a long shoot-'em-up followed by a glorified fistfight. And the "twist," if it can be called that, is hardly earthshaking.

The Matrix Revolutions begins where The Matrix Reloaded ended - with Neo (Keanu Reeves) in a coma after defeating a few sentinels. Actually, his mind is stuck in a sort of limbo (that looks like a train station) between the Matrix and the Real World. Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) and Trinity (Carrie-Ann Moss) go in after him, and are forced to make a deal with the annoyingly cultured Merovingian (Lambert Wilson) to retrieve him. Meanwhile, Agent Smith (Hugo Weaving), has found a way to escape from the Matrix in his unending quest to eliminate Neo. The machines are about to finish off Zion, and Lock (Harry J. Lennix) is running out of options. Morphius, Link (Harold Perrineau Jr.), and Niobe (Jada Pinkett Smith) decide to return to the human city, but Neo and Trinity believe their destiny lies elsewhere. So, with the fate of mankind riding on their shoulders, they head in an unexpected direction.

In recent years, the line between special effects-focused blockbusters and computer games has been shrinking, and The Matrix Revolutions further narrows the gap. All that's missing is a joystick on the theater seat arm rest. The battle for Zion should be tense and suspenseful, but the obviousness of the computer generated animation during these sequences damages the ability to suspend disbelief. I didn't ever believe that I was watching humanity's last stand. Instead, I felt like I was watching a non-playable demo for a Matrix Revolutions videogame - shoot down as many sentinels as possible before being overwhelmed. The human element is limited to a few familiar faces rather than legitimate characters we actually care about.

After playing Superman for the last movie, Neo is back to being merely mortal this time around. That makes for some degree of uncertainty about his fate, but, unfortunately, it also requires that Keanu Reeves attempt to do more than stand around looking bemused and cool in black. The Matrix Revolutions expects Reeves to act a little, but the moment he tries to show emotion, we have to fight back giggles. Sadly, Reeves isn't the only one to display acting deficiencies. His co-stars, Carrie-Ann Moss and Laurence Fishburne, are on auto-pilot. Moss tries (and fails) to make us believe that Trinty truly, madly, deeply loves Neo. Fishburne had little to do expect look stern. The only ones with any real energy are Harold Perrineau Jr. and Jada Pinkett Smith, neither of whom has a lot of screen time. The gorgeous Monica Bellucci (as Persephone) is so underused that it's inappropriate to label her appearance as anything more than a cameo, with her cleavage getting most of the attention. There has been one casting change: the enigmatic Oracle is now played by Mary Alice, replacing Gloria Foster, who died during production of The Matrix Reloaded.

When The Matrix Revolutions works, it does so as eye candy. Although the first hour drags because of the pontificating about choice and fate (none of the speeches offer anything new), the second hour zips by. The battle sequences may not be as involving as those in, say, Star Wars, but they are done with enough technical savvy to retain the attention of most viewers. And those who are on hand just to see a big-budget special effects extravaganza will be satisfied. Anyone hoping to experience the blend of science fiction, philosophy, and edgy action that characterized the previous two movies will be disappointed. Nevertheless, for completists who need to find out how it ends, The Matrix Revolutions provides answers (although not necessarily to all questions) and doesn't cop out when it comes to the final resolution.
 
May 31, 2001
15,326
2
0
If you are including the sequel as one of the major spoilers (as seems to be indicated by your title) then don't put it in the thread title, fscktard.
 

blackdogdeek

Lifer
Mar 14, 2003
14,453
10
81
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
If you are including the sequel as one of the major spoilers (as seems to be indicated by your title) then don't put it in the thread title, fscktard.

confirmed. that is a definite spoiler if true.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
If you are including the sequel as one of the major spoilers (as seems to be indicated by your title) then don't put it in the thread title, fscktard.
Exactly -- the Don't-Ruin-Movies Mod should give you a week off. :|

(ed) or let you off with a warning since you've fixed it now.
 

Legendary

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2002
7,019
1
0
I don't trust movie reviews that can't spell.
I also don't trust anything that comes out about this movie before it's out because WB has been releasing fake stuff related to the movie for awhile.
"Fishburne had little to do expect look stern"
 

Ludacris

Senior member
Oct 4, 2001
516
0
0
Didn't the brothers say there wouldn't be any more sequels? Yes! So shut up with the whining.
 

Ludacris

Senior member
Oct 4, 2001
516
0
0
?The Matrix Reloaded,? opened in theaters last summer, the freshness was missing. Burdened with over-the-top pretensions, mumbo-jumbo dialogue and the most exhausting car chase $150 million could buy, it packed theaters for a couple of weeks. Then attendance dropped significantly.

Ever since the disappointment of ?Reloaded,? there?s been some question as to whether it was a good idea to spring another ?Matrix? installment on moviegoers within the same calendar year. Remember what happened to ?Back to the Future 3,? released just a few months after ?Back to the Future 2?? It faded so quickly that most fans of the original didn?t even realize the series had switched genres, from time-travel fantasy to full-scale Western.

Nevertheless, the third installment in the ?Matrix? trilogy is already here, and there is no genre-switching. Alas. Once more, Neo the potential messiah (Keanu Reeves) is joined by his main squeeze Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss) and the fatherly Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) to do battle with a software-created world and the shape-shifting malevolence of Agent Smith (Hugo Weaving).

Once more there are multiple Smiths (and Weavings), and they?ve taken over the body of Neo?s schizzy shipmate, Bane (Ian Bliss). The reluctant Frenchman Merovingian (Lambert Wilson) is persuaded to help out, while The Oracle, chain-smoking dispenser of cookies and fortune-cookie wisdom, turns up in the shape of Mary Alice. (The late Gloria Foster played her in the first two films, and the change is cutely acknowledged.)

Unlike ?Reloaded,? this new ?Matrix? doesn?t leave the audience hanging in mid-narrative. Producer Joel Silver claims this really is the end, even if the finale does hint at more installments to come. But ?Revolutions? still makes most of the same mistakes as ?Reloaded.?

The Wachowskis, Andy and Larry, replace clever plotting with furious action, then substitute massive sets and special effects for character development. And there?s still too much dialogue that comes from the ?wherever you go, there you are? school of circuitous profundity.

Under the circumstances, the actors can do little but stay out of the way of the heavy machinery ? which includes a ferocious drill that breaks through Neo?s pals? defenses and threatens to wipe out the human race. There?s a ?Star Trek? cheesiness about too many of the performances; the romantic chemistry between Reeves and Moss has never been harder to buy.

A few touches surprise: an impromptu trip through a packed disco, the brutal exit of one major character, and a subway stop that operates on principles similar to Harry Potter?s train station. Neo finds himself stranded in this purgatory, punished by a grotesque creature who thinks he?s God and won?t let him leave.

?OK, you got yourself in here,? says Neo to himself. ?You can get yourself out.? The way Reeves says it, he might be thinking about his career.

 

Ludacris

Senior member
Oct 4, 2001
516
0
0
Movie review: 'The Matrix Revolutions'
By Mark Caro
Chicago Tribune Movie Writer


2 stars (out of 4)

"Jesus H. Christ!" someone shouts near the beginning of "The Matrix Revolutions," providing, in more ways than one, a succinct review of the movie. The exclamation could be an expression of incredulity at how far afield this "Matrix" trilogy has ventured or a literal declaration of hero Neo's ultimately obvious role model.

The original 1999 "Matrix" was the story of a seemingly ordinary guy who discovers mind-warping layers of reality as well as his own considerable powers. "The Matrix Reloaded" and now "Revolutions" are about an iconic figure's ascension to deity as the human race staves off extinction while puzzling out the meaning of existence. Whee!

"Revolutions" sets out to answer all sorts of cosmic questions, though the one most frequently asked is more mundane: Is it better than "Reloaded"? The answer is a matter of degree. Despite another ponderous beginning, this trilogy's final entry is more evenly paced than its predecessor, with amped-up action and fewer interminable stretches of pompous yakking. We're also spared the '80s disco-style thunkety-thunk that played over the "Reloaded" action scenes, and there's no citywide rave scene or Dave Matthews song over the end credits.

But if you weren't keen on the direction of "Reloaded," you're not likely to do an about-face as "Revolutions" continues down the same road. These last two movies, shot together and released six months apart, eschew the human scale and clean conceptual lines of the first "Matrix" in favor of an epic science-fiction canvas and grand notions as easy to scan as an Escher drawing on acid.

You could react on a gut level to the first movie's idea that life as we know it is just an illusion, an artificial-reality "Matrix" designed by machines to keep humans distracted as their imprisoned bodies are used to provide battery fuel. But that basic premise has been all but lost by "Revolutions" amid the philosophical smoke thrown up by the writing-directing Wachowski Brothers as they ponder levels of control systems, rogue computer viruses, programs indistinguishable from humans and a man-machine war involving space fleets, massive armies and didactical leaders.

"Reloaded" came alive only when the heroic trio of Neo (Keanu Reeves), Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss) and Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) finally left the embattled subterranean city of Zion - where the last free humans live - and returned to the Matrix. Almost none of "Revolutions" takes place in the Matrix.

Next train out

It picks up with Neo trapped in a pristine subway station that's the equivalent of limbo between the Matrix and the real world. This sequence, with its deliberate exchanges between Neo and an Indian family awaiting a train, is reminiscent of the more maddening episodes of David Lynch's "Twin Peaks."

The station is under control of the Trainman (Bruce Spence), who's under control of the Merovingian (Lambert Wilson), who's that snooty French-affected guy whom Neo and the gang bested in "Reloaded." He fits into the overall scheme of things in a way that probably isn't worth the effort of diagramming. Suffice it to say that his beautiful, formerly rebellious wife Persephone (Monica Bellucci) is given just one line of dialogue here, and Neo is not going to spend all of the trilogy's finale in a subway station.

The primary story lines seem to merge the "Star Wars" and "Lord of the Rings" universes. As in both series, the principal characters must split up to fight on different fronts: Morpheus and former gal pal Niobe (Jada Pinkett Smith) try to blast his spaceship back to Zion before the machine army destroys the place while Neo and Trinity go into Frodo-and-Samwise mode as they whiz off to the dark, evil Machine City to confront the all-powerful Deus Ex Machina.

Much of the action is kinetic, though most of it, with the notable exception of the gravity-defying "Bullet Time" gun and martial-arts battle in Club Hell, wouldn't be out of place in a "Star Wars" movie. Zionites (Zionists?) defend their home in oversize battle-bot outfits, swarms of multitentacled machine Sentinels attack at lightning speed, and spaceships career through sharp turns while firing away.

So long, Neo

It's a kick to watch, but you can't help but notice that the most exciting stretch - this epic battle for Zion - leaves Neo and Trinity off the screen for a hefty chunk of the movie. Neo used to be the heart of this thing; in "Revolutions" the transition from compelling protagonist to bloodless symbol is complete.

Everything climaxes with Neo doing Superman-vs.-Anti-Superman-style battle with ex-Agent Smith (Hugo Weaving), who proved himself so adept at self-Xeroxing in "Reloaded" but whose purpose has otherwise been unclear. I won't (and probably couldn't) reveal exactly what that purpose turns out to be, but Smith is a conceptual villain rather than someone to make your blood race.

You don't long for this confrontation the way you did the one between Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader; this fight is between an expression-challenged superpowered human (that would be Reeves as Neo) and a computer virus designed to balance out his energy in the universe. Rooting for a charismatic hero against an evil SOB just would be more fun.

But the Wachowskis have loftier notions in mind. The central character of these last two movies turns out to be the mysterious, homespun sage known as the Oracle (Mary Alice replacing the late Gloria Foster for "Revolutions"). This older woman dispenses wisdom to Neo and the gang and also offers the audience supreme guidance as Neo adopts Electric Christ-like poses while fulfilling his fate.

The ending is a lulu, an attempt to squeeze a tangle of heady philosophy into a tidy bag of Christian allegory. It illuminates the hubris of the whole project even while it leans on the most basic cliches of faith and love. Love here is often mentioned, rarely felt.

The Wachowskis are to be commended for trying to engage viewers' intellects in the context of action movies and for presenting an especially diverse group of empowered characters, with women and people of color front and center. But everything comes back to the great white hope, Neo, who moves further from our reach with each film. He's a figure made for theology or philosophy classes, but some of us prefer our movie heroes to thrive in flesh and blood.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
My mother always said that if I have nothing nice to say I should say nothing at all. So, instead I'll laugh: hee hAHAHAHA HEEEEEE HEEEE HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHA
 

Ludacris

Senior member
Oct 4, 2001
516
0
0
Four-and-a-half years after the Wachowski brothers redefined cutting-edge cinema with "The Matrix" and less than six months since the disappointing "The Matrix Reloaded," the trilogy comes to a conclusion of sorts with "The Matrix Revolutions."

Ending with neither a bang nor a whimper, the finale falls somewhere in between. It's an improvement over its concurrently shot, babbling predecessor, but it ultimately fails to capture any of that jaw-dropping sense of exhilaration that made the original such a must-see event.

While Andy and Larry Wachowski, again working in tandem with ever-innovative fight choreographer Yuen Wo Ping and accomplished visual effects supervisor John Gaeta, have cooked up some dazzling new set-pieces, the disjointed story elements prevent them from forming any kind of satisfying, cohesive whole.

Obviously, those eager to see how the potentially final adventures of Neo, Trinity, Morpheus and company unfold will ensure that "Revolutions" takes the boxoffice by storm, but less assured is its ability to generate the kind of repeat business key to the phenomenal success of the other Matrices.

Picking up where the second left off, the third finds Neo (Keanu Reeves) still in that comatose state. It's soon discovered that he's actually stuck in some kind of void between the Matrix and the Machine World represented by a gleaming white Mobil Avenue subway station. (Hmm ... scramble "Mobil" and you get "limbo." Aha!)

His true love Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss) and the still believing Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) manage to bring him back, but time is quickly running out as the Machine army is boring its way ever closer to Zion's final stronghold.

Neo does manage to find time to pay a quick visit to the Oracle (with Mary Alice taking over the role after the death of Gloria Foster), and after both acknowledge that her appearance has changed, she offers her usual oblique words of guidance.

With her credibility having been called into question after it was revealed in "Reloaded" that her Prophecy may in fact be yet another control system instituted by the Machines, Neo nevertheless takes what she says on faith.

But while the Machines pose the threat of imminent annihilation, a battle is also being fought on another front as the rogue Agent Smith (Hugo Weaving) has not only continued to replicate himself exponentially in the Matrix, but he also has hijacked the body of Bane (Ian Bliss), a real-world member of the hovercraft fleet.

As Neo and Trinity go off in one direction, the no-nonsense Niobe (Jada Pinkett Smith in a nicely expanded role) proves to be one kick-ass ship navigator.

The various clashes again unfold impressively.

While Gaeta's swarming Sentinels provide the visual oomph during that protracted war with the Machines, Wo Ping demonstrates he's still got a few nifty tricks up his sleeve -- notably a hanging-from-the-ceiling melee in a nightclub's coat and gun check room and a mano a mano fight to the finish between Neo and Smith (while his legion of Smiths look on) making extensive use of motion-capture techniques that take the technology beyond "bullet time."

If only the storytelling felt as fully integrated as the visual effects.

Thankfully not as philosophically long-winded as "Reloaded," the finale still stumbles over its share of clunky dialogue (especially the lines written for the two lovebirds) while taking its arsenal of religious iconography to heady new heights. By the end, there can be no doubt as to the identity of the One.

And, in terms of the "Matrix" trilogy, unfortunately neither of the two chapters of this epic sequel can claim that singular distinction.
 

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,504
2
81
I'm there........

"wait...something is different....I can feel them.....I can feel.....spellcheck...."
 

thenerdguy

Senior member
Jan 24, 2003
711
0
0
I realy dont freaking care! Ill make up my own mind on weather its good or bad. Thank you very much! :)
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Eh.. I'll still go see it, but at least I'll have lowered expectations. Reloaded was a major disappointment, and I expect this to be on the same level.
 

Electric Amish

Elite Member
Oct 11, 1999
23,578
1
0
You know what this trilogy reminds me of.....


The Highlander


The first one is a classic. All the sequels are kinda fvcked-up.
 

Glitchny

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2002
5,679
1
0
critcs are exactly that, critics, they have been wrong multiple times and for that i have never respected their opioins im a firm beleiver that people will watch what they like and its not my buisness to say whats good and whats not, its just what I like and what I dont so to each his own