Alien experiment - eliminate half the population

Which half of the population do you ELIMINATE?

  • Oldest

  • Youngest

  • Wealthiest

  • Poorest

  • Most Attractive

  • Least Attractive

  • Healthiest

  • Least Healthy

  • Most Intelligent

  • Least Intelligent


Results are only viewable after voting.

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,740
35
91
Advanced aliens plan to painlessly eliminate 50% of the Earth's population (they will all instantly vanish, never to be seen again), but will allow you to choose the selection criteria. If the group you select includes you, you will be exempted. Your choices for which group to eliminate are:

Oldest half of the population
Youngest half of the population
Wealthiest half of the population
Poorest half of the population
Most attractive half of the population
Least attractive half of the population
Healthiest half of the population
Least healthy half of the population
Most intelligent half of the population
Least intelligent half of the population

Which do you choose and why? If you do not choose, the aliens choose for you.

Notes

The "attractive" options are not relative to your sexual preferences; men and women will be affected equally.

Choosing the youngest half will not destroy the human race as the median age on Earth is estimated to be 28 years.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
least healthy half.

Or least intelligent

Both would have a positive impact on the population.
 

D1gger

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
5,411
2
76
At first I thought the least intelligent, but as soon as I realized that would leave me as the only person alive with an IQ less than 100 I changed it to Least Healthy. :\
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
first instinct was least intelligent, but realized education and opportunity has a lot to do with that. chose least healthy.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
If we can assume "Poorest" loosely defines those who work the least then easily the poorest. They represent the group holding back the species the most.
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
Poorest...eliminate poverty, hunger, no more need for aid as it would pretty much make every third world nation empty
 

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,740
35
91
Poorest...eliminate poverty, hunger, no more need for aid as it would pretty much make every third world nation empty

I do wonder if choosing this would eliminate so much of the world's farming base that mass starvation ensues, but I have not spent any effort trying to figure this out.
 

calvinbiss

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2001
1,745
0
0
This is a good poll. Went with least intelligent, however now I am wondering how intelligence would be determined.
 

LookBehindYou

Platinum Member
Dec 23, 2010
2,412
1
81
I went with poorest because that will probably include a good portion of the least intelligent and healthy at the same time. You killd three birds with one stone.
 

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,740
35
91
This is a good poll. Went with least intelligent, however now I am wondering how intelligence would be determined.

Obviously, some of the options are somewhat subjective, especially "attractive". You just have to assume the aliens use some criteria which most people would find reasonable, and that they have 100% knowledge of the capabilities of each person.
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
I do wonder if choosing this would eliminate so much of the world's farming base that mass starvation ensues, but I have not spent any effort trying to figure this out.
hadn't considered that...but I wouldn't think so, It would wipe out almost all of Africa and Central America, rural China and most all of the Middle East excepting the priviliged class of course, US farmers would be far enough above the middle to be fine though, might lose some Central American produce but we would be good
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
pick any group and it will eventually build itself back up. with health, you can at least knock out a lot of those poor genes and many diseases.
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
You left out the most obvious choice:

The most "evil" half (those with no care for other human beings i.e. criminals, murderers, thieves, etc.)
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
anyone who visits 4chan immediately dies. Anyone who watches daytime television. Anyone who likes vampires, mcr, or nascar too.
 

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,740
35
91
You left out the most obvious choice:

The most "evil" half (those with no care for other human beings i.e. criminals, murderers, thieves, etc.)

I intentionally left that out because I think it's much more difficult to objectively determine than the other criteria, and because I didn't want to make one choice extremely compelling.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,067
32,593
146
Your poll lacks the option "guilty"
 

Zeze

Lifer
Mar 4, 2011
11,395
1,189
126
Seriously, looks are absurd. This doesn't produce any meaning criteria in terms of 'improving' human race.

Same goes for age. Get rid of all the babies to 30s? or 40s to 100? There will be a gaping social impact both ways.

It comes down to poor or stupid. But defining that very criteria is the key. There are smart people who havent' gotten the education or chances, you can't measure intelligence based on degrees or tests.

Same for wealth. There are more than common exceptions like poor people who just needed their luck and stupid useless rich people like Paris Hilton.
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
I intentionally left that out because I think it's much more difficult to objectively determine than the other criteria, and because I didn't want to make one choice extremely compelling.

I'm assuming in this made up fantasy experiment that we have the power to do so. :p

Intelligence and attractiveness would also vary quite a bit depending on who you ask.

Anyway, I'd still get rid of the bad half. ():)

Moral character would be the best choice IMHO, see Zeze's post above for why.
 

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,740
35
91
Seriously, looks are absurd. This doesn't produce any meaning criteria in terms of 'improving' human race.

Same goes for age. Get rid of all the babies to 30s? or 40s to 100? There will be a gaping social impact both ways.

The options were not intended to be "useful", only to produce some debate. :)
 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
the question is which one of these choices will offset the 50/50 male to female ratio we kinda have going right now.
 

Zedtom

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2001
2,146
0
0
Just ask each person if they believe that there is intelligent life anywhere besides Earth. Those that say yes are allowed to live, the rest will have to be eliminated.