Alert: UN Starts Hiring Officers For USA Gun Confiscation

[OutHouse]

1998:

http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/new_world_order/news.php?q=1205528935

"107 thousand white UN railroad boxcars with 135 pairs of human shackles in each car, to the nearly 50 recently upgraded and newly built FEMA concentration camps."

I repeat, 1998

well shit the geocities links dont work. i guess the UN and red china shut them down to shut them up.

 

[PieIsAwesome]

lol!

 

[shira]

Has anyone else noticed that in the Infowars store, customers "Claim" their righteous products? Claiming makes a man feel strong.

Better hurry and order. Only 159 units left. After they're gone, everyone else will starve to death.

Of course, at Costco you can purchase a full year's supply of food for only $1500 (25% less than the pro-rata Inforwars price), but you can't "Claim" it. You can only "Add to Cart."

http://www.costco.com/9687-Total-Servings-1-Person-1-Year-Food-Storage.product.100003177.html

 

[Moonbeam]

Stewox, you're not supposed to throw the pin instead of the grenade.

 

[rudder]

All the government needs to do is triple the amount of compounds released in the chemtrails and people will forget they even owned a gun.

 

[Thebobo]

All the government needs to do is triple the amount of compounds released in the chemtrails and people will forget they even owned a gun.

Whats a gun?

 

[Bitek]

Has anyone else noticed that in the Infowars store, customers "Claim" their righteous products? Claiming makes a man feel strong.

Better hurry and order. Only 159 units left. After they're gone, everyone else will starve to death.

Of course, at Costco you can purchase a full year's supply of food for only $1500 (25% less than the pro-rata Inforwars price), but you can't "Claim" it. You can only "Add to Cart."

http://www.costco.com/9687-Total-Servings-1-Person-1-Year-Food-Storage.product.100003177.html

Hah..well, uh, "buying" stuff may imply the site owners may be trying to "sell" to you.. And someone might get the misinterpretation that the articles may be some, idk, under handed scheme to "market" "products" to you through deception!

In no way is Infowars possibly trying to make money off your paranoid fantasies they help inspire! They are generally concerned for your well-being and survival of the coming apocalypse, and are generously providing the gear you require, at reasonable markups to cover overhead and reasonable living expenses, to save yourself and your family from the living hellscape that will surly be unleashed.. Soon.

Survivalists claim. Just like the fellas in The Walking Dead.

 

[Brainonska511]

Exclamation Alert: UN Starts Hiring Officers For USA Gun Confiscation

Let me guess, this falls under this rule:

It's not my fault if it ended up innacurate.[sic]

 

[Bitek]

You know, you would think they would need more than one guy for this work. Confiscate all the guns, least you know you will have steady work for a while

 

[bradley]

Interesting creature that sovereignty

http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Sovereignty

sovereignty, supreme authority in a political community. The concept of sovereignty has had a long history of development, and it may be said that every political theorist since Plato has dealt with the notion in some manner, although not always explicitly. Jean Bodin was the first theorist to formulate a modern concept of sovereignty. In his Six Bookes of a Commonweale (1576) Bodin asserted that the prince, or the sovereign, has the power to declare law. Thomas Hobbes later furthered the concept of kingly sovereignty by stating that the king not only declares law but creates it; he thereby gave the sovereign both absolute moral and political power. Hobbes, like other social-contract theorists, asserted that the king derives his power from a populace who have collectively given up their own former personal sovereignty and power and placed it irretrievably in the king.

The concept of sovereignty was closely related to the growth of the modern nation-state, and today the term is used almost exclusively to describe the attributes of a state rather than a person. A sovereign state is often described as one that is free and independent. In its internal affairs it has undivided jurisdiction over all persons and property within its territory. It claims the right to regulate its economic life without regard for its neighbors and to increase armaments without limit. No other nation may rightfully interfere in its domestic affairs. In its external relations it claims the right to enforce its own conception of rights and to declare war.

This description of a sovereign state is denied, however, by those who assert that international law is binding. Because states are limited by treaties and international obligations and are not legally permitted by the United Nations Charter to commit aggression at will, they argue that the absolute freedom of a sovereign state is, and should be, a thing of the past. In current international practice this view is generally accepted. The United Nations is today considered the principal organ for restraining the exercise of sovereignty.

In the United States, the nation (i.e. the federal government) and each state are considered sovereign. Among conflicts in which the concept comes into play are those between the federal and state governments (see states' rights) and those between citizens and either the federal or a state government. Governments are generally held to be immune from suit for consequences of their sovereign acts (those acts the government was constituted or empowered to perform). This "sovereign immunity" must be waived to permit suit against the government. It is also encountered in claims that government officials, in pursuance of their duties, be immune from having to give evidence before a tribunal or inquiry.


See C. E. Merriam, History of the Theory of Sovereignty since Rousseau (1900, repr. 1968); H. J. Laski, Studies in the Problem of Sovereignty (1917, repr. 1968); B. de Jouvenel, Sovereignty (tr. 1957); J. L. Brierly, The Law of Nations (6th ed. 1963); F. H. Hinsley, Sovereignty (1966); A. James, Sovereign Statehood (1986).

I've also have yet to see m/any dictionaries make a clear distinction between the terms unalienable and inalienable, in regards to rights.

Unalienable rights are natural born "endowed by their creator" vs inalienable right deriving from man/woman-made "just powers from the consent of the governed." Inalienable rights are meant to enforce our natural unalienable rights and provide individual sovereignty. Wow wotta concept.

Guess what happens when you allow a king, UN or WTO etc. get in-between you and your bitness? Suddenly the a government will not secure-our natural rights unless we are wealthy, powerful or intelligent enough to make those demands. Yet, in a Representative Democracy, I did not vote any of these agencies into power or office. What a conundrum.

So for the few who know those definition and distinctions and isn't comfortable with these concepts.... you gotta' fight for your right to partay or face being a victim of this incredibly corrupt system. Cause your rights "to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" currently mean jack shit.

Another term Americans constantly get wrong is the difference between freedom *of* religion (as guaranteed by the First Amendment) and freedom *from* religion. This one should be self-explanatory, yet it isn't to most. Not like there is anything at stake here, only everyone on which this country was founded.

 

[nixium]

You guys can laugh all you want, but the person or persons who runs that site is laughing all the way to the bank. Business model:

1. Make up the most insane theories you can think of. The internet makes this easy.
2. Piddle overpriced products that align with those theories
3. Profit!!!

I bet they're making more than software engineers and scientists that actually have to deal with things like evidence, peer review and such.

It's so clever that I wish I'd thought of it first

 

[dmcowen674]

Alert: UN Starts Hiring Officers For USA Gun Confiscation
MAXIMUM ALERT


More details are reportedly on the way, maybe as soon as evening today in US or after midnight in Europe. And good luck to those who are going to choose a carrer to be a traitor.

Friendly advice if you're going to run anyway later, go away from the border, and get out of california, DC, chicago, major city, and the coasts

With all these new posters like this nut job the Forum will have to be renamed:

Nut jobs and Coo Coo's Nest

 

[bradley]

You guys can laugh all you want, but the person or persons who runs that site is laughing all the way to the bank. Business model:

1. Make up the most insane theories you can think of. The internet makes this easy.
2. Piddle overpriced products that align with those theories
3. Profit!!!

I bet they're making more than software engineers and scientists that actually have to deal with things like evidence, peer review and such.

It's so clever that I wish I'd thought of it first

Most everything written on the most popular sites nowadays seems like clickbate. There are very few news outlets that project an aire of journalistic credibility

That being said, by actually following already established truths regarding our freedoms, rights and government, this story isn't completely implausible with only a few degrees of separation. I guess that's what keeps readers clicking back for more.

Although, if stories like these get people taking and it raises awareness about issues actually affecting them, it's a fairly good compromise vs. the entire entertainment news media (and what passes for news in 2014.)

 

[IronWing]

If the US government ever decides to try gun confiscation I, for one, certainly hope they contract it out to the UN.

 

[dank69]

Most everything written on the most popular sites nowadays seems like clickbate. There are very few news outlets that project an aire of journalistic credibility

That being said, by actually following already established truths regarding our freedoms, rights and government, this story isn't completely implausible with only a few degrees of separation. I guess that's what keeps readers clicking back for more.

Although, if stories like these get people taking and it raises awareness about issues actually affecting them, it's a fairly good compromise vs. the entire entertainment news media (and what passes for news in 2014.)

 

[Victorian Gray]

And another blast from the past regarding the preparations for the final invasion of the U.S. back in 1997.

"The following is most of the message printed in THE PROPHECY CLUB NEWSLETTER from Intelligence sources in Canada and New England, [quoting:] Preparations for the COMING INVASION OF AMERICA by Russian/NWO FORCES are progressing rapidly in Canada! As candidly admitted to me by many Canadians [including author and lecturer Grant Jeffery of FINAL WARNING and many other books explaining the coming New World Order takeover] Canada it totally sold out to the NWO and its heinous agenda of world domination. (Note: I would suggest that this statement is somewhat extreme. Certainly those ADVOCATES of a New World Order operating within certain executive levels of Canadian government are sold out to the agenda, but no more so than the advocates for the NWO operating within various executive levels of the AMERICAN government. It is obvious that the majority of Canadians AND Americans desire to maintain their national independence, and it is THESE who the advocates of the New World Order are apparently willing to sacrifice in the devastating civil wars that they have 'planned' for America and Canada. We must realize that just as there is an electorate AND a secret government within America, the same holds true with Canada as well. - Branton) "

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/omegafile36.htm