• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AirForce Pilot's Reprimand

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Here is the text in full:

Following is the text of a letter of reprimand issued Tuesday by Lt.-Gen. Bruce Carlson of the United States 8th Air Force to fighter pilot Maj. Harry Schmidt, who dropped a bomb that killed four Canadian soldiers and injured eight others in April 2002 in Afghanistan:

"You are hereby reprimanded. You flagrantly disregarded a direct order from the controlling agency, exercised a total lack of basic flight discipline over your aircraft, and blatantly ignored the applicable rules of engagement and special instructions. Your wilful misconduct directly caused the most egregious consequences imaginable, the deaths of four coalition soldiers and injury to eight others. The victims of your callous misbehaviour were from one of our staunch allies in Operation Enduring Freedom and were your comrades-in-arms.

"You acted shamefully on 17 April 2002 over Tarnak Farms, Afghanistan, exhibiting arrogance and a lack of flight discipline. When your flight lead warned you to "make sure it's not friendlies" and the Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft controller directed you to "stand by" and later to "hold fire," you should have marked the location with your targeting pod. Thereafter, if you believed, as you stated, you and your leader were threatened, you should have taken a series of evasive actions and remained at a safe distance to await further instructions from AWACS. Instead, you closed on the target and blatantly disobeyed the direction to "hold fire." Your failure to follow that order is inexcusable. I do not believe you acted in defence of Maj. Umbach or yourself. Your actions indicate that you used your self-defence declaration as a pretext to strike a target, which you rashly decided was an enemy firing position, and about which you had exhausted your patience in waiting for clearance from the Combined Air Operations Center to engage. You used the inherent right of self-defence as an excuse to wage your own war.

"In your personal presentation before me on 1 July 2004, I was astounded that you portrayed yourself as a victim of the disciplinary process without expressing heartfelt remorse over the deaths and injuries you caused to the members of the Canadian Forces. In fact, you were obviously angry that the United States Air Force had dared to question your actions during the 17 April 2002 tragedy. Far from providing any defence for your actions, the written materials you presented to me at the hearing only served to illustrate the degree to which you lacked flight discipline as a wingman of COFFEE Flight on 17 April 2002.

"Through your arrogance, you undermined one of the most sophisticated weapons systems in the world, consisting of the Combined Air Operations Center, the Airborne Warning and Control System, and highly disciplined pilots, all of whom must work together in an integrated fashion to achieve combat goals. The United States Air Force is a major contributor to military victories over our nation's enemies because our pilots possess superior flight discipline. However, your actions on the night of 17 April 2002 demonstrate an astonishing lack of flight discipline. You were blessed with an aptitude for aviation, your nation provided you the best aviation training on the planet, and you acquired combat expertise in previous armed conflicts. However, by your gross poor judgment, you ignored your training and your duty to exercise flight discipline, and the result was tragic. I have no faith in your abilities to perform in a combat environment.

"I am concerned about more than your poor airmanship; I am also greatly concerned about your officership and judgment. Our Air Force core values stress "integrity first." Following the engagement in question, you lied about the reasons why you engaged the target after you were directed to hold fire and then you sought to blame others. You had the right to remain silent, but not the right to lie. In short, the final casualty of the engagement over Kandahar on 17 April 2002 was your integrity."


I realize his military career is basically over, but it is the $5,672 (U.S.) in pay he looses, instead of a Court Martial that bothers me. What is worse is that he is appealing this reprimand. He should do the honourable thing and resign without protest and apologise to the Canadian soldiers's families.
 
I have to agree with the reprimand. The guy was told to hold off, but instead he felt he needed to attack.
 
Yup, not a smart thing.

Canadian Newspapers are starting to receive letters to the editor from US citizens appalled at the reprimand instead of a court martial.
 
Originally posted by: Squisher
It does sound like he should have been Court Maritaled
"By any reasonable standard, Schmidt should have faced a jail term. Initially, he and fellow pilot Maj. William Umbach faced tough charges of manslaughter and assault as well as dereliction of duty that could have sent them to prison for 64 years. However, the U.S. military found a "strong" but insufficient case for conviction. So Carlson dropped those charges a year ago.

For the military bureaucracy, that was a relief. It avoided a court-martial process in which the pilots' defence lawyers would have tried to discredit flawed command-and-control systems that played a role in the tragedy. Those flaws were glossed over in a Canada/U.S. military probe.

In the end, Schmidt and Umbach faced only administrative censure. Umbach accepted a letter of reprimand, and retired. Now Schmidt has been dealt with in like fashion, though he can still serve in the Illinois Air National Guard. Even so, he says he plans to appeal."
 
They should airlift him and do an insertion into the middle of a canadian military training zone. Not because he screwed up or made a mistake, but because he has no remorse for what is widely considered to be at least in great part his fault.
 
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Yup, not a smart thing.

Canadian Newspapers are starting to receive letters to the editor from US citizens appalled at the reprimand instead of a court martial.

Well, I'm not terribly surprised. It's a bad precedent to start throwing criminal charges around for actions taken during war unless those actions are obvious criminal acts -- executing prisoners, desertion, etc. What he did, drop a bomb on a target, was within his normal duties though his judgment and conduct were pathetic by all accounts. I can understand why the authorities didn't want a trial if the case wasn't completely open and close. His career is over, and he has a black mark on it. The penalty he pays goes beyond that $5K he was fined.
 
Just to be clear, court-martial charges WERE preferred against Maj Schmidt, but the hearing officer who presided over the Article 32 preliminary hearing (who happened to be a senior AF judge) recommended that he be given an Article 15 nonjudicial punishment action, rather than having his case taken to trial. I am actually acquainted with his military lawyer, and it sounded to me like the government's case really collapsed at the Art 32 hearing. I think there was a real chance of a full acquittal if the case had gone to trial.

I know losing a month's pay doesn't sound like a whole lot, but in this instance it was basically the maximum punishment allowable. As AndrewR has pointed out, his career is finished, so he will actually endure much greater losses.

I find it interesting that Maj Schmidt was apparently pretty defiant at his personal appearance (a person served with an Art 15 has the right to request one), rather than being a little more gracious about the whole thing, but it sounds like Gen Carlson went into the meeting prepared to be pretty skeptical of what was to be presented.
 
The flight tape almost made me sick listening to it - you could hear the controller on the AWACS telling him to hold his fire and he outright disobyed the order to hold off and said he had to "for self defense." Yeah... those C7s and C8s are very effective at downing F16s from 20K feet.:disgust: :roll:

He's lucky this is all he got and has the balls to appeal it. I hope the USAF absolutely demolishes him on his appeal.
 
Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
And now he's counter-sueing, saying the Air Force shouldn't have made public so many details of the case... Go, cowboy!

Integrity First, Service Before Self, Excellence in All We Do -- should someone remind him of the Air Force core values?
 
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
And now he's counter-sueing, saying the Air Force shouldn't have made public so many details of the case... Go, cowboy!

Integrity First, Service Before Self, Excellence in All We Do -- should someone remind him of the Air Force core values?

Yes sir, we agree.

He is not getting much sympathy from me or any retired AF I know.
 
Back
Top