Air Force set to unveil newest stealth bomber aircraft, the B21

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126

1670002723672.png

the cost of each aircraft, including training materials, support equipment and other components of the bomber, is $692 million.
The Air Force plans to purchase at least 100 of the stealth bombers.

Long term, the idea is for these planes to replace Air Force B-52 bombers, which have been flying for more than half a century – and eventually the B-1 bombers, when they retire sometime in the 2040s.

note1:
The procurement cost per of the previous stealth bomber (B-2), as detailed in GAO reports, which include spare parts and software support, was $929 million per aircraft in 1997 dollars.
$929m in 1997 equals $1.6B in 2022. :eek:

note2:
the US originally planned to have a fleet of 132 B-2s, just 21 were ultimately purchased.
so 100 B21's might not happen

Note3:
RIP Stratofortress
 
Last edited:

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,883
6,985
136
I'm no military man, but sometimes you don't need the most expensive solution to fix the problem. Thats why the Stratofortress still exists.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
I'm no military man, but sometimes you don't need the most expensive solution to fix the problem. Thats why the Stratofortress still exists.
yeah but you first need to clear the area before those pregnant cows can go to the combat zone.

with stealth bombers, you dont (or at least that's what the sales pitch is).
altho i dont think we have ever used stealth bombers without destroying that country's air defenses first?
 

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,450
5,640
136
yeah but you first need to clear the area before those pregnant cows can go to the combat zone.

with stealth bombers, you dont (or at least that's what the sales pitch is).
altho i dont think we have ever used stealth bombers without destroying that country's air defenses first?

Internet - Thats expensive for an airplane!!
Military - That's the cheapest option for completing the mission.
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,883
6,985
136
yeah but you first need to clear the area before those pregnant cows can go to the combat zone.

with stealth bombers, you dont (or at least that's what the sales pitch is).
altho i dont think we have ever used stealth bombers without destroying that country's air defenses first?
Yeah, cruise missiles, drones, fighter jets before B-52?

But for strategic long range missions and scaring off China they might fit the bill.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,114
136
Well, the Triad stills scares everyone - so it's staying. The major powers aped it for a reason. The US taxpayer (+debt) are footing the bill. I think it's worth it not to be hit with a thermonuclear bombs.

2H 40M to showtime.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,568
126
Yeah, no. They are finally re-engining the 52. those aircraft might outlast a lot of us at this point, because they are perfectly fine bomb trucks for the kinds of missions that the US engages in most.

read up about that last week. boeing has been trying to sell the .gov on a re-engine forever. they'd been pitching a 4 engine refit, but seems that would require moving the engine pylons themselves which was always a no-go. so they've settled on the engines from a G650.
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,988
1,487
136
the b21 and NGADs(usaf and usn) should be a somewhat cheaper on maintenance of the RAM coatings(one of the bigger costs on the f22 and f35), a team at nc state u have developed a ceramic coating to replace the polymer RAM in last gen. higher durability for the navy and temp tolerance for usaf supersonic.

F35-Mirror-magu.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Racan

Stiff Clamp

Senior member
Feb 3, 2021
919
350
136
ok, I was wondering . . .

While six of the B-21 Raiders are currently in production, the Air Force plans to build 100 that can be used with or without a human crew.

Hopefully it's modular for easy tech upgrades.
 

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,695
2,293
146
read up about that last week. boeing has been trying to sell the .gov on a re-engine forever. they'd been pitching a 4 engine refit, but seems that would require moving the engine pylons themselves which was always a no-go. so they've settled on the engines from a G650.
AFAIR a large part of the lengthy delay for re-engining has always been the fact that fitting 4 big high-bypass turbofans would be too major a change to the pylons, practically a wing redesign that would require extensive testing and certification. Not only that, I think the ground clearance on the outer engine location was too low to use the more fuel efficient and desirable engines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElFenix

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,695
2,293
146
The B-21 is the second vindication of Jack Northrop's dream. If legend holds, the old man was given clearance to see the plans for the B-2 before he died, I hope that apocryphal tale is true, because it looks like his vision really is the future of bomber aviation.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
1670088489042.png

interesting...It can fold up it's wings.

or just a stupid thirst pic from dumb website?
 

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,470
3,498
136
I always kinda liked the B1B (born again bomber - hehe). It looks like an airplane not something out of the next Independence Day sequel.

But that info about radar absorbing material looks interesting. I never realized it was so fragile.
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
8,197
3,125
146
Cool. What happened to the B2 bomber?
 

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,695
2,293
146
Cool. What happened to the B2 bomber?
In short it can be said that too many of the technologies employed in its construction were 1st gen and are costly to maintain and/or unreliable. Presumably this next gen alleviates many of the problems that were revealed in the B-2.