Originally posted by: Paratus
Don't forget to get a nice cooler too.![]()
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Paratus
Don't forget to get a nice cooler too.![]()
oh crap!
guess what i might have forgot?
:Q
won't the stock HS/Fan for my NW also work?
--at least for awhile
:clock:
does it *fit*?
![]()
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Paratus
Don't forget to get a nice cooler too.![]()
oh crap!
guess what i might have forgot?
:Q
won't the stock HS/Fan for my NW also work?
--at least for awhile
:clock:
does it *fit*?
![]()
If your HSF unit is one of the later skt 478 models with the copper core then it will work fine for the P4EE....you might be able to get away with using the older all Aluminium HSF unit at stock speeds but it won't cope with much in the way of overclocking.
Originally posted by: Paratus
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Paratus
Don't forget to get a nice cooler too.![]()
oh crap!
guess what i might have forgot?
:Q
won't the stock HS/Fan for my NW also work?
--at least for awhile
:clock:
does it *fit*?
![]()
If your HSF unit is one of the later skt 478 models with the copper core then it will work fine for the P4EE....you might be able to get away with using the older all Aluminium HSF unit at stock speeds but it won't cope with much in the way of overclocking.
I had the copper core Intel HSF. It only managed to keep my Prescott at 62C under load.
My Zalmon 9500CNPS - 48C(52C w/X1950)
Originally posted by: apoppin
good news!
i'll give it a try first ... go from there
the EE and the NW differ primarily in the EE having 2MB of L3 cache ... NW has no L3 ... both .13nm CPUs ... right? ... Prescotts are hotter running 09nm CPUs with more L2 cache than either the NW or EE ... it's been "awhile" and i didn't pay much attention to the EE as it was still so expensive and getting smoked by the FX, anyway ... although it did fairly well against the a64 4000+, i believe
that's what it was ...Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: apoppin
good news!
i'll give it a try first ... go from there
the EE and the NW differ primarily in the EE having 2MB of L3 cache ... NW has no L3 ... both .13nm CPUs ... right? ... Prescotts are hotter running 09nm CPUs with more L2 cache than either the NW or EE ... it's been "awhile" and i didn't pay much attention to the EE as it was still so expensive and getting smoked by the FX, anyway ... although it did fairly well against the a64 4000+, i believe
Nope, it didn't...4000+ handed the EE it's ass in everything you could throw at it.
the P4EE 3.4ghz is comparable to a 3400+ in most tasks...the extra L3 doesn't offer a huge performance increase of the regular 3.4ghz P4...not enougth to justify to $1000+ price tag anyway, but it's enougth to keep it close to a 3400+...maybe a 3500+ in some encoding disciplines...always a strong point of the Netburst based CPU's.
Overclocked to 3.8ghz it see it close the gap on the 4000+ and it should get pretty close to one in most benchmarks...and probably beat it out in most encoding disciplines.
Originally posted by: Stumps
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html
this should give you a rough idea of how the P4EE 3.4 performs
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Stumps
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html
this should give you a rough idea of how the P4EE 3.4 performs
awesome!
i had the GPU chart ... didn't know about this one
i stayed up reviewing the old EE reviews ... it performs very much like a A64 3200+ [minimum - in games] up to a A64 3800+ [sometimes] and even beats the FX53 very occasionally [in Q3]... depending on the specific benchmark .... in "office" applications and encoding it performs even better [MS Word 97 should load very - very - quickly]
-no matter how you look at it .. a stock 3.4EE is a substantial upgrade over my O/C'd 2.80c even at 3.31Ghz
[i remembered that part right]
and an o/c'd one might really 'shine'
now i probably gotta buy a nice HS/F
-- more money
2x 1GB PC 5000 ... next?
:disgust:
depends![]()
worth it?Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Stumps
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html
this should give you a rough idea of how the P4EE 3.4 performs
awesome!
i had the GPU chart ... didn't know about this one
i stayed up reviewing the old EE reviews ... it performs very much like a A64 3200+ [minimum - in games] up to a A64 3800+ [sometimes] and even beats the FX53 very occasionally [in Q3]... depending on the specific benchmark .... in "office" applications and encoding it performs even better [MS Word 97 should load very - very - quickly]
-no matter how you look at it .. a stock 3.4EE is a substantial upgrade over my O/C'd 2.80c even at 3.31Ghz
[i remembered that part right]
and an o/c'd one might really 'shine'
now i probably gotta buy a nice HS/F
-- more money
2x 1GB PC 5000 ... next?
:disgust:
depends![]()
Yeah, but is it really worth it? I mean, are you not getting acceptable framerates in games right now? It doesn't make a lot of sense to upgrade the CPU at this point even IF you are CPU limited. The only time CPU limited should matter is if you turned on all the eye candy you want in a game and you are still CPU limited, then and only then, would I consider upgrading the CPU and then, it would have be if the frame-rates were low. Just my opinion on it.
I am sitting on a 3500+ right (ok, 4000+ since it is O/C) and I know the upgrade bug... I have almost pulled the trigger twice on getting a 939 X2, but it just doesn't make a lot of sense because 1) I will be doing an overhaul within a year anyway and 2) the performance difference won't mean anything because I can still enjoy any game I want at acceptable frame-rates. Think it over![]()
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
That reminds me... We should all get a co-op game of SS2 going on... Apop, do you have it? Dialup isn't a concern so much with co-op, so I am sure you could join up... Pretty cool game overall.
Originally posted by: apoppin
worth it?Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Stumps
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html
this should give you a rough idea of how the P4EE 3.4 performs
awesome!
i had the GPU chart ... didn't know about this one
i stayed up reviewing the old EE reviews ... it performs very much like a A64 3200+ [minimum - in games] up to a A64 3800+ [sometimes] and even beats the FX53 very occasionally [in Q3]... depending on the specific benchmark .... in "office" applications and encoding it performs even better [MS Word 97 should load very - very - quickly]
-no matter how you look at it .. a stock 3.4EE is a substantial upgrade over my O/C'd 2.80c even at 3.31Ghz
[i remembered that part right]
and an o/c'd one might really 'shine'
now i probably gotta buy a nice HS/F
-- more money
2x 1GB PC 5000 ... next?
:disgust:
depends![]()
Yeah, but is it really worth it? I mean, are you not getting acceptable framerates in games right now? It doesn't make a lot of sense to upgrade the CPU at this point even IF you are CPU limited. The only time CPU limited should matter is if you turned on all the eye candy you want in a game and you are still CPU limited, then and only then, would I consider upgrading the CPU and then, it would have be if the frame-rates were low. Just my opinion on it.
I am sitting on a 3500+ right (ok, 4000+ since it is O/C) and I know the upgrade bug... I have almost pulled the trigger twice on getting a 939 X2, but it just doesn't make a lot of sense because 1) I will be doing an overhaul within a year anyway and 2) the performance difference won't mean anything because I can still enjoy any game I want at acceptable frame-rates. Think it over![]()
absolutely .. it is an $80 upgrade
--and it brings me *in line* with your CPU [if i can o/c it]
Would you like to be *stuck* with an A64 2800+ ... at stock speeds, Mr. 4000+?
and like you, i am upgrading next year, too
and 'yep', i have SS2 ... seriously ...
didn't like it ... a bit ... SS & SSse just blew it away in the "fun" factor ... if not graphically
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: apoppin
worth it?Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Stumps
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html
this should give you a rough idea of how the P4EE 3.4 performs
awesome!
i had the GPU chart ... didn't know about this one
i stayed up reviewing the old EE reviews ... it performs very much like a A64 3200+ [minimum - in games] up to a A64 3800+ [sometimes] and even beats the FX53 very occasionally [in Q3]... depending on the specific benchmark .... in "office" applications and encoding it performs even better [MS Word 97 should load very - very - quickly]
-no matter how you look at it .. a stock 3.4EE is a substantial upgrade over my O/C'd 2.80c even at 3.31Ghz
[i remembered that part right]
and an o/c'd one might really 'shine'
now i probably gotta buy a nice HS/F
-- more money
2x 1GB PC 5000 ... next?
:disgust:
depends![]()
Yeah, but is it really worth it? I mean, are you not getting acceptable framerates in games right now? It doesn't make a lot of sense to upgrade the CPU at this point even IF you are CPU limited. The only time CPU limited should matter is if you turned on all the eye candy you want in a game and you are still CPU limited, then and only then, would I consider upgrading the CPU and then, it would have be if the frame-rates were low. Just my opinion on it.
I am sitting on a 3500+ right (ok, 4000+ since it is O/C) and I know the upgrade bug... I have almost pulled the trigger twice on getting a 939 X2, but it just doesn't make a lot of sense because 1) I will be doing an overhaul within a year anyway and 2) the performance difference won't mean anything because I can still enjoy any game I want at acceptable frame-rates. Think it over![]()
absolutely .. it is an $80 upgrade
--and it brings me *in line* with your CPU [if i can o/c it]
Would you like to be *stuck* with an A64 2800+ ... at stock speeds, Mr. 4000+?
and like you, i am upgrading next year, too
and 'yep', i have SS2 ... seriously ...
didn't like it ... a bit ... SS & SSse just blew it away in the "fun" factor ... if not graphically
I wouldn't mind honestly. You can still play everything you want, right?
My "predictions" have always been goodOriginally posted by: apoppin
i am looking for that one last "cheap" "interim" upgrade. . . . it's been about 8 months since i asked here last and was hoping for an "update" from you guys . . .
I am running a 2.80c right now at 3.31Ghz . . . . i know the Northwoods are "dead end" and the best i can hope for - for a decent upgrade - is a 3.2c o/c'd to ~3.7+ghz
i can't find ANY new 3.4Cs
The 3.2c is still pretty expensive now . . . ~$275. . . however i can still get a few bucks for my 2.80c . . . is it a worthwhile [likely] upgrade from 3.3 to 3.7Ghz? or shall i just save my money for '07?
....
i forgot which, but my 2.80c is not a "good" stepping . . . . and +500Mhz is just an 'average' O/C for a NW
i figure 3.8Ghz would be a goal to make a worthwhile upgrade for less than $100
then it's A-64 all the way [unless intel has a good showing late '06]
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Ahhh, makes sense. Your plans, your money![]()
