• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Age dating question.

umm..thats a moral question.....so let me ask you this...

'Whats the youngest person you would date (assuming you are 21)?'
 
Originally posted by: crisp82
umm..thats a moral question.....so let me ask you this...

'Whats the youngest person you would date (assuming you are 21)?'

Well, I once saw this really pretty 15 year old. She didn't act 15 though.

But I would I have to say 17. Is this ok?
 
The whole "18" thing is, IMO, a good gauge of how old a girl should be emotionally before handling the aspects of consensual sex. However the whole issue with age of consent gets blown way out of hand. There are plenty of girls 16-17 who are just as capable of handling themselves in the same situation with the same amount of responsibility -- hell, 16 is the AOC in many states anyway. While it's fine to set these age limits, the reactions I see of some people when another comments on the "potential bedding quality" of an underage girl just seems overboard -- "OMG YOU LOOKED AT A 17 YEAR OLD! SHE'S UNDERAGE YOU PEDO!"

Cripes, back in the 1920's a girl was considered a "Swinger" if she didn't get hitched by the age of 12. Show how much times change.
 
Originally posted by: amnesiac
Cripes, back in the 1920's a girl was considered a "Swinger" if she didn't get hitched by the age of 12. Show how much times change.

we live a lot longer now too... kinda makes you think... to a point of deminishing returns there could be a correlation between when you start reproducing and how long you live..... just maybe.... or i'm reaching pretty deep into logic
 
Originally posted by: amnesiac
The whole "18" thing is, IMO, a good gauge of how old a girl should be emotionally before handling the aspects of consensual sex. However the whole issue with age of consent gets blown way out of hand. There are plenty of girls 16-17 who are just as capable of handling themselves in the same situation with the same amount of responsibility -- hell, 16 is the AOC in many states anyway. While it's fine to set these age limits, the reactions I see of some people when another comments on the "potential bedding quality" of an underage girl just seems overboard -- "OMG YOU LOOKED AT A 17 YEAR OLD! SHE'S UNDERAGE YOU PEDO!"

Cripes, back in the 1920's a girl was considered a "Swinger" if she didn't get hitched by the age of 12. Show how much times change.

People seem to forget that being attracted to a girl who's 17 is most definitely NOT pedophilia. (Pedophilia is the sexual fetish of being attracted to children- who have not yet developed secondary sexual characteristics.)
 
Back
Top