Awesome cover, check it out if your a fan of either band.
http://xxknivesout.ffasylum.com/headlikeahole.htm
http://xxknivesout.ffasylum.com/headlikeahole.htm
Originally posted by: flot
Well, it is technically good (IE sounds good, well done) but I'm not crazy about it. Doesn't have the same soul as the original.
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: flot
Well, it is technically good (IE sounds good, well done) but I'm not crazy about it. Doesn't have the same soul as the original.
I agree. The only thing it really has going for it is that the chords are right and it has some kind of production value.
Other than that it has no substance, but that's the same for a lot of the pop rock music today.
Originally posted by: Operandi
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: flot
Well, it is technically good (IE sounds good, well done) but I'm not crazy about it. Doesn't have the same soul as the original.
I agree. The only thing it really has going for it is that the chords are right and it has some kind of production value.
Other than that it has no substance, but that's the same for a lot of the pop rock music today.
Idk, I don't really know what you mean by "no substance". I tink it's an awesome song as far as covers go.
Originally posted by: Operandi
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: flot
Well, it is technically good (IE sounds good, well done) but I'm not crazy about it. Doesn't have the same soul as the original.
I agree. The only thing it really has going for it is that the chords are right and it has some kind of production value.
Other than that it has no substance, but that's the same for a lot of the pop rock music today.
Idk, I don't really know what you mean by "no substance". I tink it's an awesome song as far as covers go.
Originally posted by: Crazymofo
Originally posted by: Operandi
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: flot
Well, it is technically good (IE sounds good, well done) but I'm not crazy about it. Doesn't have the same soul as the original.
I agree. The only thing it really has going for it is that the chords are right and it has some kind of production value.
Other than that it has no substance, but that's the same for a lot of the pop rock music today.
Idk, I don't really know what you mean by "no substance". I tink it's an awesome song as far as covers go.
No it is an awesome song that when covered by a decent band still is an awesome song but it doesnt have the same soul of the original song... I agree over produced and too punk for me... but it does sound good and will probably be popular with a younger crowd one that hasnt actually heard the NIN version...
According to the DJ-man, that's correct.Originally posted by: KirbsAw
The tag says its from the GTA: San Andreas OST, is that true?
I remember seeing that the original NIN version would be in it....
Originally posted by: Operandi
Originally posted by: Crazymofo
Originally posted by: Operandi
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: flot
Well, it is technically good (IE sounds good, well done) but I'm not crazy about it. Doesn't have the same soul as the original.
I agree. The only thing it really has going for it is that the chords are right and it has some kind of production value.
Other than that it has no substance, but that's the same for a lot of the pop rock music today.
Idk, I don't really know what you mean by "no substance". I tink it's an awesome song as far as covers go.
No it is an awesome song that when covered by a decent band still is an awesome song but it doesnt have the same soul of the original song... I agree over produced and too punk for me... but it does sound good and will probably be popular with a younger crowd one that hasnt actually heard the NIN version...
Well there is allways going to be one orginal... but I've been comparing the two for awhile now and I think I prefer the AFI version. It seems to have a bit more energy seems like it may have an increased tempo the NIN version seems to crawl compared to AFI.
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Operandi
Originally posted by: Crazymofo
Originally posted by: Operandi
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: flot
Well, it is technically good (IE sounds good, well done) but I'm not crazy about it. Doesn't have the same soul as the original.
I agree. The only thing it really has going for it is that the chords are right and it has some kind of production value.
Other than that it has no substance, but that's the same for a lot of the pop rock music today.
Idk, I don't really know what you mean by "no substance". I tink it's an awesome song as far as covers go.
No it is an awesome song that when covered by a decent band still is an awesome song but it doesnt have the same soul of the original song... I agree over produced and too punk for me... but it does sound good and will probably be popular with a younger crowd one that hasnt actually heard the NIN version...
Well there is allways going to be one orginal... but I've been comparing the two for awhile now and I think I prefer the AFI version. It seems to have a bit more energy seems like it may have an increased tempo the NIN version seems to crawl compared to AFI.
You probably prefer because:
A) You're under 20.
B) You're already an AFI fan and really haven't listened to much NIN. (which is probably be A is true)