This came across on another mailing list I am on. Very interesting, plausible response to "What did they hope to gain by this massive terrorist attack" and a and bleak picture of Afghanistan today.
Reed
***************************************************************
Subject: A view from Afghanistan
Dear Friends,
The following was sent to me by my friend Tamim
Ansary. Tamim is an Afghani-American writer. He is
also one of the most brilliant people I know in this
life. When he writes, I read. When he talks, I
listen. Here is his take on Afghanistan and the whole
mess we are in.
-Gary T.
Dear Gary and whoever else is on this email thread:
I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing
Afghanistan back to the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO
Talk Radio today, allowed that this would mean killing
innocent people, people who had nothing to do with
this
atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept
colateral damage. What else can we do?" Minutes later
I heard some TV pundit discussing whether we "have the
belly to do what must be done."
And I thought about the issues being raised especially
hard because I am from Afghanistan, and even though
I've lived here (the US) for 35 years I've
never lost track of what's going on there. So I want
to tell anyone who will listen how it all looks from
where I'm standing.
I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin
Laden. There is no doubt in my mind that these people
were responsible for the atrocity in New York. I agree
that something must be done about those monsters.
But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan.
They're not even the government of Afghanistan. The
Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics who took
over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political
criminal with a plan. When you think Taliban, think
Nazis. When you think Bin Laden, think Hitler. And
when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the
Jews in the concentration camps." It's not
only that the Afghan people had nothing to do with
this atrocity. They were the first victims of the
perpetrators. They would exult if someone would come
in there, take out the Taliban and clear out the rats
nest of international thugs holed up in their country.
Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow
the Taliban? The answer is, they're starved,
exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering. A few years
ago, the United Nations estimated that there are
500,000 disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country
with no economy, no food. There are millions of
widows. And the Taliban has been burying these
widows alive in mass graves. The soil is littered
with land mines, the farms were all destroyed by the
Soviets. These are a few of the reasons why the
Afghan people have not overthrown the Taliban.
We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan
back to the Stone Age. Trouble is, that's been done.
The Soviets took care of it already. Make the Afghans
suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses?
Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done.
Eradicate their hospitals? Done. Destroy their
infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine and health
care? Too late. Someone already did all that. New
bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs.
Would they at least get the Taliban? Not likely. In
today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat, only they
have the means to move around. They'd slip away and
hide. Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled
orphans, they don't move too fast, they don't even
have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul and dropping
bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the
criminals who did this horrific thing. Actually it
would only be making common cause with the Taliban--by
raping once again the people they've been raping all
this time.
So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me
now speak with true fear and trembling. The only way
to get Bin Laden is to go in there with ground troops.
When people speak of "having the belly to do what
needs to be done" they're thinking in terms of having
the belly to kill as many as needed. Having the belly
to overcome any moral qualms about killing innocent
people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's
actually on the table is Americans dying. And not just
because some Americans would die fighting their way
through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's much
bigger than that folks. Because to get any
troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through
Pakistan. Would they let us? Not likely. The conquest
of Pakistan would have to be first. Will other Muslim
nations just stand by? You see where I'm going. We're
flirting with a world war between Islam and the West.
And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's
exactly what he wants. That's why he did this. Read
his speeches and statements. It's all right there. He
really believes Islam would beat the west. It might
seem ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the
world into Islam and the West, he's got a billion
soldiers. If the west wreaks a holocaust in those
lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to
lose, that's even better from Bin Laden's point of
view. He's probably wrong, in the end the west would
win, whatever that would mean, but the war would last
for years and millions would die, not just theirs but
ours. Who has the belly for that? Bin Laden does.
Anyone else?
Tamim Ansary
Facebook
Twitter