I decided to go with the turbo-R instead of the a7v133. Anyway, I've got 4 IDE devices I want to hook up. I was thinking about doing the following:
IDE 1 Master - 30 GB Quantum Fireball Plus AS 7200 ATA-100
IDE 1 Slave - EMPTY
IDE 2 Master - 10GB Maxtor Diamond Max Plus 7200 ATA-33
IDE 2 Slave - 52x CDRom drive
IDE 3 Master - Internal Atapi Zip Drive 100
IDE 3 Slave - EMPTY
IDE 4 Master/Slave - EMPTY
The reason I left the IDE 1 slave empty is because I wanted the 30GB Quantum on it's own seperate channel. It's the only ATA-100 device in the system so I didn't want the slower ATA devices causing a bottleneck on that channel (if thats possible)
Is this setup possible? And if so is it optimal? I've got a SCSI cd-r, but I think I'm gonna eventually upgrade to a faster atapi cdrw. That's why I wanted the extra IDE channels offered by RAID. I have no intention on setting up a raid array.
Comments?
IDE 1 Master - 30 GB Quantum Fireball Plus AS 7200 ATA-100
IDE 1 Slave - EMPTY
IDE 2 Master - 10GB Maxtor Diamond Max Plus 7200 ATA-33
IDE 2 Slave - 52x CDRom drive
IDE 3 Master - Internal Atapi Zip Drive 100
IDE 3 Slave - EMPTY
IDE 4 Master/Slave - EMPTY
The reason I left the IDE 1 slave empty is because I wanted the 30GB Quantum on it's own seperate channel. It's the only ATA-100 device in the system so I didn't want the slower ATA devices causing a bottleneck on that channel (if thats possible)
Is this setup possible? And if so is it optimal? I've got a SCSI cd-r, but I think I'm gonna eventually upgrade to a faster atapi cdrw. That's why I wanted the extra IDE channels offered by RAID. I have no intention on setting up a raid array.
Comments?