- Dec 12, 2005
- 869
- 63
- 91
Here is my current set up:
I have two internet providers and two networks - Time Warner Cable and AT&T DSL.
On the Time Warner network, I am connecting our VOIP phones (6 phones) via an old Netgear FVS318 Router.
On the DSL network, I have connected our computers & printers (9 units) via a Netgear FS726T switch connected to a Netgear FVS338 router.
If one of the internet lines goes down, I physically reconnect the phones or the switch from one router to the other.
I would like to be able to have a router that will provide load balancing/failover between the two internet connections. Obviously QOS is important, since now the computers will be sharing the connection with the phones. The other important piece is that it needs to have enough ethernet ports to connect all the phones directly to it, since connecting them to a switch will cause too many problems. The last bit is that I have a very limited budget ($500).
Does this sound like a good idea, and if so can anyone recommend a router that would fit the criteria? Or would it be better to stick with the current set up of two routers and just upgrade the routers?
Thanks for the help.
I have two internet providers and two networks - Time Warner Cable and AT&T DSL.
On the Time Warner network, I am connecting our VOIP phones (6 phones) via an old Netgear FVS318 Router.
On the DSL network, I have connected our computers & printers (9 units) via a Netgear FS726T switch connected to a Netgear FVS338 router.
If one of the internet lines goes down, I physically reconnect the phones or the switch from one router to the other.
I would like to be able to have a router that will provide load balancing/failover between the two internet connections. Obviously QOS is important, since now the computers will be sharing the connection with the phones. The other important piece is that it needs to have enough ethernet ports to connect all the phones directly to it, since connecting them to a switch will cause too many problems. The last bit is that I have a very limited budget ($500).
Does this sound like a good idea, and if so can anyone recommend a router that would fit the criteria? Or would it be better to stick with the current set up of two routers and just upgrade the routers?
Thanks for the help.
