Hi guys,
I'm about to start my first homebuild PC. Currently, I have a Dell w/ Intel Pentium D 2.8 GHz, 2 GB RAM which I used for SD video editing. Now I need a better faster computer for HD video editing.
Please note that I am not a gamer. The PC will be used primarily for day-to-day tasks as well as graphics intensive activities such as video encoding, ripping, 1080p HD video editing, motion graphics.
I live in the U.S., and am looking for a budget between $500-$800 without the monitor.
My planned configuration is as follows:
Intel i5-2500K 3.4 GHz CPU
ASRock P67 Pro3 Motherboard
6 GB DDR3-1600 RAM
2 TB HDD
DVD-RW Drive
nVidia GeForce GTX 460 Video Card (768 MB)
Antec Three Hundred Illusion Case
Ultra 650LSP 650W PSU
I found a good deal for a INTEL Core i5-2500k at my local microcenter for only $179.00 --- but the same store is also running a deal for the AMD Phenom II X4 965 for $150 plus another $50 for **ANY** AMD motherboard. To be honest, I am tempted at saving more money if I can take advantage of this deal.
Most AMD motherboards support DDR2 RAM as well as DDR3, but the Intel P67/H67 chipset for the Socket 1155 only support DDR3 from what I understand -- I have about 8GB DDR2 sticks sitting around at home, so buying the AMD has the additional advantage of being able to recycle my old DDR2-RAM.
From the cost-standpoint, buying the Core i5-2500k + Intel motherboard (1155) + DDR3 RAM will run me about $200 extra compared to getting the AMD phenom II x4 965 + AMD motherboard + DDR2 RAM (which AMD boards are OK with).
Tom's Hardware and a few other sites state that the new Sandybridge i5-2500k absolutely blows the socks out of the AMD quad core processors, but I know with serious overclocking it is aimed towards gamers, and since this is not my primary purpose, should I just save myself the $200 by switching to AMD? Or, is the upgrade worth it, albeit for serious video editing and graphics processing (like w/ Adobe After Effects). In otherwords, does overclocking help even these processes become faster?
So if you guys can do me the following big favors, I would greatly appreciate it.
a). Please comment on my config for my stated purpose
b). Provide me on your opinion about whether I should stay with the Intel system or go to AMD? I don't have a preference one way or the other (although my experience mostly has been w/ Intel CPUs).
Again, I am sorry if this is rather stupid. I am new to PC hardware so I am challenging myself with this project.
I'm about to start my first homebuild PC. Currently, I have a Dell w/ Intel Pentium D 2.8 GHz, 2 GB RAM which I used for SD video editing. Now I need a better faster computer for HD video editing.
Please note that I am not a gamer. The PC will be used primarily for day-to-day tasks as well as graphics intensive activities such as video encoding, ripping, 1080p HD video editing, motion graphics.
I live in the U.S., and am looking for a budget between $500-$800 without the monitor.
My planned configuration is as follows:
Intel i5-2500K 3.4 GHz CPU
ASRock P67 Pro3 Motherboard
6 GB DDR3-1600 RAM
2 TB HDD
DVD-RW Drive
nVidia GeForce GTX 460 Video Card (768 MB)
Antec Three Hundred Illusion Case
Ultra 650LSP 650W PSU
I found a good deal for a INTEL Core i5-2500k at my local microcenter for only $179.00 --- but the same store is also running a deal for the AMD Phenom II X4 965 for $150 plus another $50 for **ANY** AMD motherboard. To be honest, I am tempted at saving more money if I can take advantage of this deal.
Most AMD motherboards support DDR2 RAM as well as DDR3, but the Intel P67/H67 chipset for the Socket 1155 only support DDR3 from what I understand -- I have about 8GB DDR2 sticks sitting around at home, so buying the AMD has the additional advantage of being able to recycle my old DDR2-RAM.
From the cost-standpoint, buying the Core i5-2500k + Intel motherboard (1155) + DDR3 RAM will run me about $200 extra compared to getting the AMD phenom II x4 965 + AMD motherboard + DDR2 RAM (which AMD boards are OK with).
Tom's Hardware and a few other sites state that the new Sandybridge i5-2500k absolutely blows the socks out of the AMD quad core processors, but I know with serious overclocking it is aimed towards gamers, and since this is not my primary purpose, should I just save myself the $200 by switching to AMD? Or, is the upgrade worth it, albeit for serious video editing and graphics processing (like w/ Adobe After Effects). In otherwords, does overclocking help even these processes become faster?
So if you guys can do me the following big favors, I would greatly appreciate it.
a). Please comment on my config for my stated purpose
b). Provide me on your opinion about whether I should stay with the Intel system or go to AMD? I don't have a preference one way or the other (although my experience mostly has been w/ Intel CPUs).
Again, I am sorry if this is rather stupid. I am new to PC hardware so I am challenging myself with this project.