- Oct 16, 2002
- 142
- 0
- 0
Hi guys -
I'm consulting for a company doing general troubleshooting/setup/network admin/etc and as you know one important part of such a position is planning future tech purchases and an overall strategy for such. The boss is very interested in such stuff and basically set abunch of the company up himself and then hired me to come in and fix it all.
The company will probably be expanding in the future and require purchasing some workstations and a new server.
Here's the issue: in my opinion, the boss is OBSESSED with small details or issues that frankly I think fall under not seeing the forest for the trees. I would like opinions on how to deal with this professionally - including the possibility that I'm totally wrong and I really should be considering all this in purchases. I should note: he's not an IT boss - for all intents I'm the IT manager of the company. In my opinion he has really much more important things to be doing than obsessing over DDR speeds - like running the company.
Example: He is really insistent on quiet PC's - which I agree with - but insists that a new server must have processors that "dissapate no more than 20 watts, Quiet technology SCSI harddiscs, Quiet performance, achieved through large slow fans, sound insulation, Small profile case (such as blades) would be preferred, Advanced southbridge architecture for optimal data transfer speed..."
These are the kinds of things he sends me. An Intel or AMD CPU dissapates about 60 watts, so the only thing left is some sort of VIA C3 or something. I would honestly just rather buy a Dell (or some other standardized) server and have it done with. I recently put in a Dell 2600 Poweredge and thought it quite nice, though it's not silent.
Here's the other thing - he's always going off on me that we HAVE to buy computers that have the "Via 8237 southbridge or better" and small profile cases (like shuttles or the like) with fanless powersupplies. I honestly don't want to be looking at southbridges when I'm speccing a new workstation for some accountant. To me, chosing a computer only because of it's southbridge is like choosing a car because it has a slightly more efficient fuel injection system. It's just not that big of a deal and 2 years down the road you won't give a crap anyway.
I don't want to give the impression that I'm lazy, because I really do put in the work and am willing to do whatever I'm told. But I also don't want an inventory sheet where every little chipset is noted and I have to keep track of non-standardized parts or special cases for certain workstations.
Anyway, comments?
I'm consulting for a company doing general troubleshooting/setup/network admin/etc and as you know one important part of such a position is planning future tech purchases and an overall strategy for such. The boss is very interested in such stuff and basically set abunch of the company up himself and then hired me to come in and fix it all.
The company will probably be expanding in the future and require purchasing some workstations and a new server.
Here's the issue: in my opinion, the boss is OBSESSED with small details or issues that frankly I think fall under not seeing the forest for the trees. I would like opinions on how to deal with this professionally - including the possibility that I'm totally wrong and I really should be considering all this in purchases. I should note: he's not an IT boss - for all intents I'm the IT manager of the company. In my opinion he has really much more important things to be doing than obsessing over DDR speeds - like running the company.
Example: He is really insistent on quiet PC's - which I agree with - but insists that a new server must have processors that "dissapate no more than 20 watts, Quiet technology SCSI harddiscs, Quiet performance, achieved through large slow fans, sound insulation, Small profile case (such as blades) would be preferred, Advanced southbridge architecture for optimal data transfer speed..."
These are the kinds of things he sends me. An Intel or AMD CPU dissapates about 60 watts, so the only thing left is some sort of VIA C3 or something. I would honestly just rather buy a Dell (or some other standardized) server and have it done with. I recently put in a Dell 2600 Poweredge and thought it quite nice, though it's not silent.
Here's the other thing - he's always going off on me that we HAVE to buy computers that have the "Via 8237 southbridge or better" and small profile cases (like shuttles or the like) with fanless powersupplies. I honestly don't want to be looking at southbridges when I'm speccing a new workstation for some accountant. To me, chosing a computer only because of it's southbridge is like choosing a car because it has a slightly more efficient fuel injection system. It's just not that big of a deal and 2 years down the road you won't give a crap anyway.
I don't want to give the impression that I'm lazy, because I really do put in the work and am willing to do whatever I'm told. But I also don't want an inventory sheet where every little chipset is noted and I have to keep track of non-standardized parts or special cases for certain workstations.
Anyway, comments?