Advanced Vehicle Technology bill passed

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
http://bit.ly/N3ZfX
^is the above article about it passing, but a subscription is required... below is a former automotive news article about the bill

A bill introduced by U.S. Rep. Gary Peters, D-Mich., to authorize $550 million in advanced technology vehicles r&d funding for fiscal year 2010 will be on the House floor this month.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., is expected to make the announcement at an event in suburban Detroit today, according to Congressional sources. Hoyer is expected to voice support for the legislation. This would potentially bolster the bill?s acceptance outside traditional automotive regions like Michigan, Ohio and Indiana.

The funding, which would increase to $590 million by 2014, would allow the Department of Energy to create an r&d, commercial application and demonstration program for advanced vehicle technologies.

The bill, the Advanced Vehicle Technology Act of 2009 (H.R. 3246) was introduced on July 17, and was unanimously approved by the House Committee on Science and Technology on July 21.

In addition to Peters and Hoyer, representatives from General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., the Original Equipment Suppliers Association, ArvinMeritor Inc., Robert Bosch L.L.C. and others are expected to attend today's event in Troy, Mich.

Good bill imo, defense implications, and more implications for future vehicles in general.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,570
6,712
126
Recently I dismissed the hydrogen car but now I'm thinking it may be the way to go after all. There is significant and highly interesting research going on in hydrogen storage. A three hundred mile tank seems not too far away. An MIT chemist is making hydrogen directly from sun light like plants do that seems easy enough to scale up for home use to power the home and the car completely off grid.
 

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
12,024
1,131
126
In the article it says DoE not DoD. Which makes more sense unless you're talking about a DARPA project.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.